Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
953.5 m³/hr Required
13.4 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 953.5 m³/hr
Head: 13.4 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
18 XHC 2185 6P
28 HC 8P
8312-14 311F
8 KL
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
250-250-400A 4P
12 WLN 21A
350-300-429 DESC
18 XHC 2186 4P
250-250-400 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 87.1/100 78.2/100 64.3/100 62.7/100 62.0/100 61.3/100 61.2/100 61.0/100 59.7/100 58.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 74.8% 80.7% 79.8% 68.2% 80.3% 72.2% 87.5% 87.0% 77.0% 81.1%
Power Consumption (kW) 46.6 49.4 50.7 55.7 72.8 51.8 62.2 77.3 77.2 112.2
Head Accuracy 13.4m 15.3m 15.6m 14.6m 22.5m 14.4m 21.0m 25.9m 22.9m 35.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 74.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 87.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 87.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
18 XHC 2185 6P
R1,019,927/year
46.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
28 HC 8P
R1,081,707/year
49.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-14 311F
R1,111,206/year
50.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 KL
R1,219,961/year
55.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R1,593,619/year
72.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400A 4P
R1,134,968/year
51.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 WLN 21A
R1,362,618/year
62.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
350-300-429 DESC
R1,692,607/year
77.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 XHC 2186 4P
R1,691,512/year
77.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 4P
R2,456,348/year
112.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
18 XHC 2185 6P
R60,199
Initial + 10-year energy cost
28 HC 8P
R60,817
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-14 311F
R61,112
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 KL
R62,200
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R65,936
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400A 4P
R61,350
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 WLN 21A
R63,626
Initial + 10-year energy cost
350-300-429 DESC
R66,926
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 XHC 2186 4P
R66,915
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 4P
R74,563
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
18 XHC 2185 6P
Baseline
Reference point
28 HC 8P
-R61,780/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8312-14 311F
-R91,279/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8 KL
-R200,035/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
-R573,692/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400A 4P
-R115,041/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12 WLN 21A
-R342,691/year
Additional cost vs baseline
350-300-429 DESC
-R672,680/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 XHC 2186 4P
-R671,585/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400 4P
-R1,436,421/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 12 WLN 21A (87.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 XHC 2185 6P (R1,019,927/year)
Annual Cost Range: R1,436,421 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R14,364,210 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

18 XHC 2185 6P

87.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.8%
Power 46.6 kW
Head 13.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

28 HC 8P

78.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.7%
Power 49.4 kW
Head 15.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

8312-14 311F

64.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.8%
Power 50.7 kW
Head 15.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

8 KL

62.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.2%
Power 55.7 kW
Head 14.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

18 HC 1214 4P SABS

62.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.3%
Power 72.8 kW
Head 22.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-400A 4P

61.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.2%
Power 51.8 kW
Head 14.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

12 WLN 21A

61.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 87.5%
Power 62.2 kW
Head 21.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

350-300-429 DESC

61.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 87.0%
Power 77.3 kW
Head 25.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

18 XHC 2186 4P

59.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.0%
Power 77.2 kW
Head 22.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

250-250-400 4P

58.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.1%
Power 112.2 kW
Head 35.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection