Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
95.0 m³/hr Required
13.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 95.0 m³/hr
Head: 13.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
80-200 2F
WXH-100-240
80-250 2F
7 MC
65-125 2F
100-200 CAISION
100-200 2F
4/5 ALE
100-250 2F
65-315 2F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 85.4/100 79.7/100 75.4/100 74.5/100 74.1/100 72.9/100 72.8/100 71.4/100 69.8/100 66.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 76.0% 74.8% 81.8% 76.0% 81.1% 65.7% 73.3% 76.8% 75.5% 72.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 5.0 4.7 5.7 5.2 7.6 7.7 4.9 8.8 6.7 12.0
Head Accuracy 14.8m 13.6m 18.1m 15.2m 23.7m 19.6m 13.8m 26.0m 19.6m 33.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 74.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
80-200 2F
R110,091/year
5.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-100-240
R103,040/year
4.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-250 2F
R125,158/year
5.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
7 MC
R113,201/year
5.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-125 2F
R165,433/year
7.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 CAISION
R169,287/year
7.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 2F
R106,434/year
4.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 ALE
R192,260/year
8.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-250 2F
R147,146/year
6.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-315 2F
R263,063/year
12.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
80-200 2F
R51,101
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-100-240
R51,030
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-250 2F
R51,252
Initial + 10-year energy cost
7 MC
R51,132
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-125 2F
R51,654
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 CAISION
R51,693
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 2F
R51,064
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 ALE
R51,923
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-250 2F
R51,471
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-315 2F
R52,631
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
80-200 2F
Baseline
Reference point
WXH-100-240
+R7,052/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-250 2F
-R15,067/year
Additional cost vs baseline
7 MC
-R3,110/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-125 2F
-R55,341/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 CAISION
-R59,196/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 2F
+R3,657/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 ALE
-R82,169/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-250 2F
-R37,055/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-315 2F
-R152,972/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 80-250 2F (81.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: WXH-100-240 (R103,040/year)
Annual Cost Range: R160,023 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,600,233 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

80-200 2F

85.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 5.0 kW
Head 14.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

WXH-100-240

79.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.8%
Power 4.7 kW
Head 13.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

80-250 2F

75.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.8%
Power 5.7 kW
Head 18.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

7 MC

74.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 5.2 kW
Head 15.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

65-125 2F

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.1%
Power 7.6 kW
Head 23.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

100-200 CAISION

72.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.7%
Power 7.7 kW
Head 19.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

100-200 2F

72.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.3%
Power 4.9 kW
Head 13.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

4/5 ALE

71.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.8%
Power 8.8 kW
Head 26.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

100-250 2F

69.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.5%
Power 6.7 kW
Head 19.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

65-315 2F

66.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.8%
Power 12.0 kW
Head 33.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection