Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
949.0 m³/hr Required
27.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 949.0 m³/hr
Head: 27.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
18 HC 1214 4P
250-250-400 4P
12/15 V.S.M.F.V
12 WLN 14A
18 XHC 2185 4P
12 WLN 21B
350-300-429 DESC
250/300 BST
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
10 ADM
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 78.4/100 75.9/100 75.1/100 75.0/100 74.8/100 74.4/100 74.1/100 70.6/100 69.8/100 69.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 79.7% 81.0% 77.1% 79.5% 77.7% 86.2% 86.1% 86.4% 80.6% 79.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 91.0 112.0 93.2 93.3 99.6 108.2 97.4 107.8 89.2 114.2
Head Accuracy 28.0m 35.1m 27.8m 28.7m 29.9m 36.0m 32.4m 36.0m 27.8m 35.2m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 79.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 86.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 86.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 86.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
18 HC 1214 4P
R1,992,856/year
91.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 4P
R2,453,588/year
112.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12/15 V.S.M.F.V
R2,040,992/year
93.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 WLN 14A
R2,043,686/year
93.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 XHC 2185 4P
R2,182,094/year
99.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 WLN 21B
R2,369,186/year
108.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
350-300-429 DESC
R2,132,644/year
97.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250/300 BST
R2,360,623/year
107.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R1,953,370/year
89.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10 ADM
R2,500,608/year
114.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
18 HC 1214 4P
R69,929
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 4P
R74,536
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12/15 V.S.M.F.V
R70,410
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 WLN 14A
R70,437
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 XHC 2185 4P
R71,821
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 WLN 21B
R73,692
Initial + 10-year energy cost
350-300-429 DESC
R71,326
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250/300 BST
R73,606
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R69,534
Initial + 10-year energy cost
10 ADM
R75,006
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
18 HC 1214 4P
Baseline
Reference point
250-250-400 4P
-R460,732/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12/15 V.S.M.F.V
-R48,136/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12 WLN 14A
-R50,830/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 XHC 2185 4P
-R189,238/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12 WLN 21B
-R376,330/year
Additional cost vs baseline
350-300-429 DESC
-R139,788/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250/300 BST
-R367,767/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
+R39,486/year
Cost savings vs baseline
10 ADM
-R507,752/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 250/300 BST (86.4% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1214 4P SABS (R1,953,370/year)
Annual Cost Range: R547,237 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R5,472,372 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

18 HC 1214 4P

78.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.7%
Power 91.0 kW
Head 28.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

250-250-400 4P

75.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.0%
Power 112.0 kW
Head 35.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

12/15 V.S.M.F.V

75.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.1%
Power 93.2 kW
Head 27.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

12 WLN 14A

75.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.5%
Power 93.3 kW
Head 28.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

18 XHC 2185 4P

74.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.7%
Power 99.6 kW
Head 29.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

12 WLN 21B

74.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 86.2%
Power 108.2 kW
Head 36.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

350-300-429 DESC

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 86.1%
Power 97.4 kW
Head 32.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

250/300 BST

70.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 86.4%
Power 107.8 kW
Head 36.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

18 HC 1214 4P SABS

69.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.6%
Power 89.2 kW
Head 27.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

10 ADM

69.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.8%
Power 114.2 kW
Head 35.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection