Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed

90.0 m³/hr Required

14.4 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 90.0 m³/hr

Head: 14.4 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	80-200 2F	WXH-100-240	4/5 ALE	100-200 CAISION	7 MC	80-250 2F	65-125 2F	100-200 2F	65-315 2F	100-250 2F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	87.3/100	79.5/100	78.9/100	75.2/100	75.1/100	74.4/100	73.9/100	69.0/100	68.2/100	67.8/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	75.7%	57.3%	76.9%	66.8%	75.6%	81.1%	80.9%	70.1%	72.7%	74.7%
Power Consumption (kW)	4.9	6.2	6.3	7.6	5.1	5.6	7.3	5.2	10.5	6.5
Head Accuracy	15.0m	14.4m	19.6m	20.8m	15.7m	18.4m	24.2m	14.9m	31.2m	19.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 75.7%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 57.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 76.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 66.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 75.6%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 80.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 70.1%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 72.7%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 74.7%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

80-200 2F

R106,609/year

4.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

WXH-100-240

R134,926/year

6.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4/5 ALE

R137,204/year

6.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

100-200 CAISION

R167,185/year

7.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

7 MC

R111,602/year

5.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

80-250 2F

R121,786/year

5.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-125 2F

R160,593/year

7.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

100-200 2F

R114,471/year

5.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-315 2F

R230,454/year

10.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

100-250 2F

R142,569/year

6.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

80-200 2F

R51,066

Initial + 10-year energy cost

WXH-100-240

R51,349

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4/5 ALE

R51,372

Initial + 10-year energy cost

100-200 CAISION

R51,672

Initial + 10-year energy cost

7 MC

R51,116

Initial + 10-year energy cost

80-250 2F

R51,218

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-125 2F

R51,606

Initial + 10-year energy cost

100-200 2F

R51,145

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-315 2F

R52,305

Initial + 10-year energy cost

100-250 2F

R51,426

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

80-200 2F

Baseline

Reference point

WXH-100-240

-R28,317/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4/5 ALE

-R30,594/year

Additional cost vs baseline

100-200 CAISION

-R60,575/year

Additional cost vs baseline

7 MC

-R4,993/year

Additional cost vs baseline

80-250 2F

-R15,177/year

Additional cost vs baseline

65-125 2F

-R53,984/year

Additional cost vs baseline

100-200 2F

-R7,862/year

Additional cost vs baseline

65-315 2F

-R123,844/year

Additional cost vs baseline

100-250 2F

-R35,960/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: 80-250 2F (81.1% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: 80-200 2F (R106,609/year)

Annual Cost Range: R123,844 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R1,238,445 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

80-200 2F

WXH-100-240

4/5 ALE

100-200 CAISION

7 MC

80-250 2F

65-125 2F

100-200 2F

65-315 2F

100-250 2F

Pump Details