Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed

9.4 m³/hr Required

6.5 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 9.4 m³/hr

Head: 6.5 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	WXH-50-160	4504-42564	4503-42937	32-200 2F	WXH-40-135 2P	4503-44787	4505-48159	WXH-65-185	6 XLC	80-50-315 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	82.2/100	66.2/100	63.2/100	55.0/100	40.9/100	35.0/100	31.6/100	27.5/100	18.9/100	17.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	53.8%	50.7%	52.6%	61.2%	44.5%	49.8%	42.9%	41.8%	60.0%	42.4%
Power Consumption (kW)	0.3	0.4	0.7	0.4	1.0	1.3	0.5	0.4	0.5	1.0
Head Accuracy	7.1m	7.6m	13.8m	10.0m	17.4m	24.4m	8.6m	6.5m	12.0m	16.5m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 53.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 50.7%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 52.6%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 61.2%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 44.5%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 49.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 42.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 41.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 42.4%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

WXH-50-160

R7,380/year

0.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4504-42564

R8,453/year

0.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4503-42937

R14,739/year

0.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

32-200 2F

R9,154/year

0.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

WXH-40-135 2P

R22,010/year

1.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4503-44787

R27,463/year

1.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4505-48159

R11,235/year

0.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

WXH-65-185

R8,738/year

0.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

6 XLC

R11,257/year

0.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

80-50-315 4P

R21,878/year

1.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

WXH-50-160

R50,074

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4504-42564

R50,085

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4503-42937

R50,147

Initial + 10-year energy cost

32-200 2F

R50,092

Initial + 10-year energy cost

WXH-40-135 2P

R50,220

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4503-44787

R50,275

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4505-48159

R50,112

Initial + 10-year energy cost

WXH-65-185

R50,087

Initial + 10-year energy cost

6 XLC

R50,113

Initial + 10-year energy cost

80-50-315 4P

R50,219

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

WXH-50-160

Baseline

Reference point

4504-42564

-R1,073/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4503-42937

-R7,358/year

Additional cost vs baseline

32-200 2F

-R1,774/year

Additional cost vs baseline

WXH-40-135 2P

-R14,629/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4503-44787

-R20,082/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4505-48159

-R3,854/year

Additional cost vs baseline

WXH-65-185

-R1,358/year

Additional cost vs baseline

6 XLC

-R3,876/year

Additional cost vs baseline

80-50-315 4P

-R14,498/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: 32-200 2F (61.2% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: WXH-50-160 (R7,380/year)

Annual Cost Range: R20,082 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R200,823 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

WXH-50-160

4504-42564

4503-42937

32-200 2F

WXH-40-135 2P

4503-44787

4505-48159

WXH-65-185

6 XLC

80-50-315 4P

Pump Details