Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed

86.9 m³/hr Required

30.0 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 86.9 m³/hr

Head: 30.0 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	4/5 ALE	65-315 2F	3WLN12K	50-160 2F 2P	8 LC	65-160 2F 2P	3 K	Nitz 100-80-250	4506-48171	4/5 BLE
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	90.5/100	89.1/100	88.7/100	83.6/100	75.8/100	75.6/100	74.8/100	72.5/100	69.9/100	69.9/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	76.0%	72.3%	73.6%	77.2%	76.6%	75.9%	69.8%	76.0%	61.9%	77.1%
Power Consumption (kW)	9.3	10.3	10.2	11.3	9.9	11.5	10.5	16.6	19.5	9.3
Head Accuracy	30.0m	31.6m	31.6m	36.7m	32.0m	37.0m	31.0m	53.3m	50.9m	30.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 72.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 73.6%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 77.2%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 76.6%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 75.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 69.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 61.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 77.1%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

4/5 ALE

R204,699/year

9.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-315 2F

R226,556/year

10.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

3WLN12K

R222,307/year

10.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

50-160 2F 2P

R246,660/year

11.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

8 LC

R216,613/year

9.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-160 2F 2P

R252,441/year

11.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

3 K

R230,016/year

10.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

Nitz 100-80-250

R363,978/year

16.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4506-48171

R425,977/year

19.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4/5 BLE

R203,933/year

9.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

4/5 ALE

R52,047

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-315 2F

R52,266

Initial + 10-year energy cost

3WLN12K

R52,223

Initial + 10-year energy cost

50-160 2F 2P

R52,467

Initial + 10-year energy cost

8 LC

R52,166

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-160 2F 2P

R52,524

Initial + 10-year energy cost

3 K

R52,300

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Nitz 100-80-250

R53,640

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4506-48171

R54,260

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4/5 BLE

R52,039

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

4/5 ALE

Baseline

Reference point

65-315 2F

-R21,856/year

Additional cost vs baseline

3WLN12K

-R17,608/year

Additional cost vs baseline

50-160 2F 2P

-R41,960/year

Additional cost vs baseline

8 LC

-R11,914/year

Additional cost vs baseline

65-160 2F 2P

-R47,742/year

Additional cost vs baseline

3 K

-R25,316/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Nitz 100-80-250

-R159,279/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4506-48171

-R221,278/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4/5 BLE

+R766/year

Cost savings vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: 50-160 2F 2P (77.2% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: 4/5 BLE (R203,933/year)

Annual Cost Range: R222,044 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R2,220,441 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

4/5 ALE

65-315 2F

3WLN12K

50-160 2F 2P

8 LC

65-160 2F 2P

3 K

Nitz 100-80-250

4506-48171

4/5 BLE

Pump Details