Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
854.9 m³/hr Required
16.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 854.9 m³/hr
Head: 16.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
250-250-400A 4P
28 HC 8P
8 KL
18 HC 1213 4P
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
250-250-450 6P
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
18 HC 1214 4P
10 ADM
250-250-400 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 77.0/100 74.8/100 70.4/100 70.1/100 66.0/100 65.3/100 63.9/100 63.8/100 62.9/100 61.9/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 75.2% 76.0% 76.6% 81.0% 80.2% 75.3% 82.0% 80.2% 82.8% 81.4%
Power Consumption (kW) 54.4 50.9 58.0 60.5 76.0 52.8 47.2 88.5 109.9 82.6
Head Accuracy 17.6m 16.6m 19.1m 21.0m 26.2m 17.1m 16.6m 30.5m 39.1m 28.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.4%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
250-250-400A 4P
R1,192,192/year
54.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
28 HC 8P
R1,114,338/year
50.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 KL
R1,270,966/year
58.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P
R1,324,162/year
60.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R1,665,145/year
76.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R1,156,539/year
52.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R1,032,804/year
47.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 4P
R1,939,223/year
88.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10 ADM
R2,407,533/year
109.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 4P
R1,808,502/year
82.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
250-250-400A 4P
R61,922
Initial + 10-year energy cost
28 HC 8P
R61,143
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 KL
R62,710
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P
R63,242
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
R66,651
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R61,565
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R60,328
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 4P
R69,392
Initial + 10-year energy cost
10 ADM
R74,075
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 4P
R68,085
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
250-250-400A 4P
Baseline
Reference point
28 HC 8P
+R77,854/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8 KL
-R78,774/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1213 4P
-R131,969/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1214 4P SABS
-R472,952/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
+R35,653/year
Cost savings vs baseline
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
+R159,388/year
Cost savings vs baseline
18 HC 1214 4P
-R747,031/year
Additional cost vs baseline
10 ADM
-R1,215,341/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400 4P
-R616,310/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 10 ADM (82.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1213 4P SABS (R1,032,804/year)
Annual Cost Range: R1,374,729 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R13,747,287 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

250-250-400A 4P

77.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 54.4 kW
Head 17.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

28 HC 8P

74.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 50.9 kW
Head 16.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

8 KL

70.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.6%
Power 58.0 kW
Head 19.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

18 HC 1213 4P

70.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.0%
Power 60.5 kW
Head 21.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

18 HC 1214 4P SABS

66.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 76.0 kW
Head 26.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-450 6P

65.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.3%
Power 52.8 kW
Head 17.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

18 HC 1213 4P SABS

63.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.0%
Power 47.2 kW
Head 16.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

18 HC 1214 4P

63.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 88.5 kW
Head 30.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

10 ADM

62.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.8%
Power 109.9 kW
Head 39.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

250-250-400 4P

61.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.4%
Power 82.6 kW
Head 28.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection