Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

7 Pumps Analyzed
851.5 m³/hr Required
306.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 851.5 m³/hr
Head: 306.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
8X10X13 3S NEW
8X10X13 2S
PJ 200
8X10X13 4S NEW
8X10X13 3S
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 68.1/100 68.1/100 64.9/100 50.6/100 44.8/100 26.3/100 -17.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 84.4% 84.4% 78.8% 44.0% 65.2% 79.5% 54.4%
Power Consumption (kW) 1011.9 1011.9 909.3 1613.7 1239.9 1251.0 6393.4
Head Accuracy 368.1m 368.1m 308.9m 306.0m 348.5m 428.5m 1499.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 84.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 44.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 54.4%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
R22,159,756/year
1011.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
R22,159,756/year
1011.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 3S NEW
R19,913,385/year
909.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 2S
R35,339,789/year
1613.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 200
R27,153,000/year
1239.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 4S NEW
R27,396,352/year
1251.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 3S
R140,014,912/year
6393.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
R271,598
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
R271,598
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 3S NEW
R249,134
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 2S
R403,398
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 200
R321,530
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 4S NEW
R323,964
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 3S
R1,450,149
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
Baseline
Reference point
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
-R-0/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8X10X13 3S NEW
+R2,246,371/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8X10X13 2S
-R13,180,033/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PJ 200
-R4,993,244/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8X10X13 4S NEW
-R5,236,597/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8X10X13 3S
-R117,855,157/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4) (84.4% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 8X10X13 3S NEW (R19,913,385/year)
Annual Cost Range: R120,101,527 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,201,015,272 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)

68.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.4%
Power 1011.9 kW
Head 368.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

MSD10x10x13.5 3 4

68.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.4%
Power 1011.9 kW
Head 368.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

8X10X13 3S NEW

64.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.8%
Power 909.3 kW
Head 308.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

8X10X13 2S

50.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 44.0%
Power 1613.7 kW
Head 306.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

PJ 200

44.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.2%
Power 1239.9 kW
Head 348.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

8X10X13 4S NEW

26.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.5%
Power 1251.0 kW
Head 428.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

8X10X13 3S

-17.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 54.4%
Power 6393.4 kW
Head 1499.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection