Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
84.0 m³/hr Required
53.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 84.0 m³/hr
Head: 53.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
50-200 2F 2P
WXH-34-35-100
WXH-64-35-100
50-250 2F 2P
PL 80 AN
3X4X10.5 H SJA
4/5 DME
4/5 CME
65-200 2F 2P
Nitz 100-80-250
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 83.3/100 79.4/100 79.4/100 73.5/100 73.2/100 72.0/100 71.8/100 69.9/100 69.7/100 65.8/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 75.5% 42.0% 42.0% 73.4% 70.7% 70.0% 70.8% 69.6% 71.3% 62.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 19.5 29.3 29.3 21.9 22.2 27.4 21.8 19.8 17.5 43.3
Head Accuracy 64.4m 53.8m 53.8m 70.3m 68.7m 83.7m 67.4m 60.1m 54.7m 118.7m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 75.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 42.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 42.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
50-200 2F 2P
R428,057/year
19.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-34-35-100
R641,977/year
29.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-35-100
R641,977/year
29.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F 2P
R480,442/year
21.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 80 AN
R487,122/year
22.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R599,272/year
27.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 DME
R477,157/year
21.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 CME
R432,656/year
19.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R384,192/year
17.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
Nitz 100-80-250
R947,657/year
43.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
50-200 2F 2P
R54,281
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-34-35-100
R56,420
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-35-100
R56,420
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F 2P
R54,804
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 80 AN
R54,871
Initial + 10-year energy cost
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R55,993
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 DME
R54,772
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 CME
R54,327
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R53,842
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Nitz 100-80-250
R59,477
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
50-200 2F 2P
Baseline
Reference point
WXH-34-35-100
-R213,919/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-35-100
-R213,919/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F 2P
-R52,385/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 80 AN
-R59,064/year
Additional cost vs baseline
3X4X10.5 H SJA
-R171,214/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4/5 DME
-R49,100/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4/5 CME
-R4,599/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
+R43,866/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Nitz 100-80-250
-R519,599/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 50-200 2F 2P (75.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F 2P (R384,192/year)
Annual Cost Range: R563,465 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R5,634,651 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

50-200 2F 2P

83.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.5%
Power 19.5 kW
Head 64.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

WXH-34-35-100

79.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 42.0%
Power 29.3 kW
Head 53.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

WXH-64-35-100

79.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 42.0%
Power 29.3 kW
Head 53.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

50-250 2F 2P

73.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.4%
Power 21.9 kW
Head 70.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

PL 80 AN

73.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.7%
Power 22.2 kW
Head 68.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

3X4X10.5 H SJA

72.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 27.4 kW
Head 83.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

4/5 DME

71.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.8%
Power 21.8 kW
Head 67.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

4/5 CME

69.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.6%
Power 19.8 kW
Head 60.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

65-200 2F 2P

69.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.3%
Power 17.5 kW
Head 54.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

Nitz 100-80-250

65.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.8%
Power 43.3 kW
Head 118.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection