Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

9 Pumps Analyzed

8.0 m³/hr Required

5.6 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 8.0 m³/hr

Head: 5.6 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	WXH-50-160	4503-42937	4504-42564	32-200 2F	WXH-40-135 2P	4503-44787	6 XLC	6 LC	PJ 80 AS
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	67.0/100	52.1/100	47.0/100	40.2/100	27.7/100	15.2/100	9.9/100	-3.0/100	-6.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	48.6%	49.3%	45.2%	57.8%	40.3%	44.4%	56.1%	44.0%	46.5%
Power Consumption (kW)	0.3	0.6	0.4	0.4	1.0	1.2	0.5	0.9	1.3
Head Accuracy	7.3m	14.4m	7.8m	10.2m	18.5m	24.9m	12.3m	17.5m	27.2m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 48.6%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 49.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 45.2%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 57.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 40.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 44.4%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 56.1%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 44.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 46.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

WXH-50-160

R7,161/year

0.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4503-42937

R13,906/year

0.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4504-42564

R8,234/year

0.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

32-200 2F

R8,453/year

0.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

WXH-40-135 2P

R21,922/year

1.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4503-44787

R26,784/year

1.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

6 XLC

R10,468/year

0.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

6 LC

R18,944/year

0.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

PJ 80 AS

R27,944/year

1.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

WXH-50-160

R50,072

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4503-42937

R50,139

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4504-42564

R50,082

Initial + 10-year energy cost

32-200 2F

R50,085

Initial + 10-year energy cost

WXH-40-135 2P

R50,219

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4503-44787

R50,268

Initial + 10-year energy cost

6 XLC

R50,105

Initial + 10-year energy cost

6 LC

R50,189

Initial + 10-year energy cost

PJ 80 AS

R50,279

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

WXH-50-160

Baseline

Reference point

4503-42937

-R6,745/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4504-42564

-R1,073/year

Additional cost vs baseline

32-200 2F

-R1,292/year

Additional cost vs baseline

WXH-40-135 2P

-R14,761/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4503-44787

-R19,622/year

Additional cost vs baseline

6 XLC

-R3,307/year

Additional cost vs baseline

6 LC

-R11,782/year

Additional cost vs baseline

PJ 80 AS

-R20,783/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: 32-200 2F (57.8% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: WXH-50-160 (R7,161/year)

Annual Cost Range: R20,783 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R207,831 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

WXH-50-160

67.0

Overall Score

Efficiency 48.6%

Power 0.3 kW

Head 7.3 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 2

4503-42937

52.1

Overall Score

Efficiency 49.3%

Power 0.6 kW

Head 14.4 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 3

4504-42564

47.0

Overall Score

Efficiency 45.2%

Power 0.4 kW

Head 7.8 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 4

32-200 2F

40.2

Overall Score

Efficiency 57.8%

Power 0.4 kW

Head 10.2 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 5

WXH-40-135 2P

27.7

Overall Score

Efficiency 40.3%

Power 1.0 kW

Head 18.5 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 6

4503-44787

15.2

Overall Score

Efficiency 44.4%

Power 1.2 kW

Head 24.9 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 7

6 XLC

9.9

Overall Score

Efficiency 56.1%

Power 0.5 kW

Head 12.3 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 8

6 LC

-3.0

Overall Score

Efficiency 44.0%

Power 0.9 kW

Head 17.5 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

RANK 9

PJ 80 AS

-6.4

Overall Score

Efficiency 46.5%

Power 1.3 kW

Head 27.2 m

Impeller mm

Manufacturer APE Pumps

Add to Shortlist

Full Report

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

WXH-50-160

4503-42937

4504-42564

32-200 2F

WXH-40-135 2P

4503-44787

6 XLC

6 LC

PJ 80 AS

Pump Details