Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
695.0 m³/hr Required
14.3 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 695.0 m³/hr
Head: 14.3 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
18 HC 1214 6P
250-250-450 6P
250-250-400A 4P
18 HC 1213 4P
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
16 HC 1264 4P
QW400-26-45
250-250-400 6P
250-250-360A 4P
8 KL
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 74.5/100 69.5/100 69.4/100 66.8/100 63.5/100 63.4/100 62.8/100 62.4/100 61.6/100 61.2/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 80.0% 80.8% 76.4% 81.5% 82.2% 75.9% 69.9% 78.6% 72.0% 78.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 33.9 50.8 53.5 61.3 55.8 46.0 49.0 34.5 37.6 55.8
Head Accuracy 14.3m 21.7m 21.6m 26.4m 24.2m 18.4m 18.1m 14.3m 14.3m 23.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
18 HC 1214 6P
R741,381/year
33.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R1,112,608/year
50.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400A 4P
R1,171,343/year
53.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P
R1,343,434/year
61.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R1,222,962/year
55.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 4P
R1,007,334/year
46.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
QW400-26-45
R1,073,253/year
49.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 6P
R754,586/year
34.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360A 4P
R823,747/year
37.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 KL
R1,222,918/year
55.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
18 HC 1214 6P
R57,414
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R61,126
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400A 4P
R61,713
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P
R63,434
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R62,230
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 4P
R60,073
Initial + 10-year energy cost
QW400-26-45
R60,733
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 6P
R57,546
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360A 4P
R58,237
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 KL
R62,229
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
18 HC 1214 6P
Baseline
Reference point
250-250-450 6P
-R371,227/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400A 4P
-R429,963/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1213 4P
-R602,053/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
-R481,581/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1264 4P
-R265,954/year
Additional cost vs baseline
QW400-26-45
-R331,873/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400 6P
-R13,206/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-360A 4P
-R82,366/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8 KL
-R481,537/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 18 HC 1213 4P SABS (82.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1214 6P (R741,381/year)
Annual Cost Range: R602,053 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R6,020,529 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

18 HC 1214 6P

74.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 33.9 kW
Head 14.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

250-250-450 6P

69.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.8%
Power 50.8 kW
Head 21.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

250-250-400A 4P

69.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.4%
Power 53.5 kW
Head 21.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

18 HC 1213 4P

66.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.5%
Power 61.3 kW
Head 26.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

18 HC 1213 4P SABS

63.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.2%
Power 55.8 kW
Head 24.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

16 HC 1264 4P

63.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.9%
Power 46.0 kW
Head 18.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

QW400-26-45

62.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.9%
Power 49.0 kW
Head 18.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

250-250-400 6P

62.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.6%
Power 34.5 kW
Head 14.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

250-250-360A 4P

61.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.0%
Power 37.6 kW
Head 14.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

8 KL

61.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 55.8 kW
Head 23.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection