Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
664.9 m³/hr Required
10.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 664.9 m³/hr
Head: 10.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
18 XHC 2185 6P
250-250-400 6P
18 HC 1214 6P
250-250-450 6P
250-250-400A 4P
250-250-360A 4P
18 HC 1213 4P
FD 300-250-400
16 HC 1264 4P
QW400-26-45
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 79.9/100 79.2/100 73.5/100 65.4/100 63.2/100 62.9/100 59.5/100 58.8/100 58.1/100 57.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 79.4% 80.0% 80.2% 81.5% 76.0% 73.9% 81.2% 80.5% 77.7% 71.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 29.6 32.2 27.6 50.1 52.7 34.6 60.9 44.0 45.5 48.6
Head Accuracy 13.0m 14.2m 12.2m 22.5m 22.1m 14.1m 27.3m 19.6m 19.5m 19.1m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 79.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
18 XHC 2185 6P
R647,627/year
29.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 6P
R704,129/year
32.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 6P
R605,272/year
27.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R1,097,475/year
50.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400A 4P
R1,153,407/year
52.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360A 4P
R757,893/year
34.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P
R1,333,469/year
60.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
FD 300-250-400
R964,498/year
44.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 4P
R996,910/year
45.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
QW400-26-45
R1,063,880/year
48.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
18 XHC 2185 6P
R56,476
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 6P
R57,041
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 6P
R56,053
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R60,975
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400A 4P
R61,534
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360A 4P
R57,579
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P
R63,335
Initial + 10-year energy cost
FD 300-250-400
R59,645
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 4P
R59,969
Initial + 10-year energy cost
QW400-26-45
R60,639
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
18 XHC 2185 6P
Baseline
Reference point
250-250-400 6P
-R56,502/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1214 6P
+R42,355/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
-R449,848/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-400A 4P
-R505,780/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-360A 4P
-R110,266/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1213 4P
-R685,842/year
Additional cost vs baseline
FD 300-250-400
-R316,871/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1264 4P
-R349,283/year
Additional cost vs baseline
QW400-26-45
-R416,253/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 250-250-450 6P (81.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1214 6P (R605,272/year)
Annual Cost Range: R728,197 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R7,281,969 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

18 XHC 2185 6P

79.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.4%
Power 29.6 kW
Head 13.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

250-250-400 6P

79.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 32.2 kW
Head 14.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

18 HC 1214 6P

73.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 27.6 kW
Head 12.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

250-250-450 6P

65.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.5%
Power 50.1 kW
Head 22.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

250-250-400A 4P

63.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 52.7 kW
Head 22.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-360A 4P

62.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.9%
Power 34.6 kW
Head 14.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

18 HC 1213 4P

59.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.2%
Power 60.9 kW
Head 27.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

FD 300-250-400

58.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.5%
Power 44.0 kW
Head 19.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

16 HC 1264 4P

58.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.7%
Power 45.5 kW
Head 19.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

QW400-26-45

57.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.2%
Power 48.6 kW
Head 19.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection