Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
663.5 m³/hr Required
24.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 663.5 m³/hr
Head: 24.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
18 HC 1213 4P
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
250-250-360 4P
16 HC 1264 4P
8 KL
250-250-400 4P
8/10 BLE
250-250-450 6P
8 WLN 21A
10 ADM
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 81.4/100 79.6/100 76.2/100 75.3/100 72.8/100 71.1/100 70.3/100 69.5/100 67.2/100 66.2/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 81.2% 82.0% 80.3% 75.0% 77.0% 78.1% 89.5% 68.0% 75.7% 82.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 60.9 56.0 57.2 59.3 57.8 65.5 66.8 65.4 120.7 101.1
Head Accuracy 27.3m 25.4m 25.4m 24.6m 24.6m 28.3m 33.1m 24.6m 50.5m 46.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 81.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 89.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
18 HC 1213 4P
R1,332,922/year
60.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R1,226,641/year
56.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360 4P
R1,253,578/year
57.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 4P
R1,298,758/year
59.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 KL
R1,265,010/year
57.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400 4P
R1,435,085/year
65.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8/10 BLE
R1,463,314/year
66.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R1,432,435/year
65.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 WLN 21A
R2,642,279/year
120.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10 ADM
R2,213,542/year
101.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
18 HC 1213 4P
R63,329
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
R62,266
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360 4P
R62,536
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 4P
R62,988
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 KL
R62,650
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400 4P
R64,351
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8/10 BLE
R64,633
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R64,324
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 WLN 21A
R76,423
Initial + 10-year energy cost
10 ADM
R72,135
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
18 HC 1213 4P
Baseline
Reference point
18 HC 1213 4P SABS
+R106,281/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-360 4P
+R79,344/year
Cost savings vs baseline
16 HC 1264 4P
+R34,164/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8 KL
+R67,912/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-400 4P
-R102,163/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8/10 BLE
-R130,393/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
-R99,514/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8 WLN 21A
-R1,309,357/year
Additional cost vs baseline
10 ADM
-R880,621/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 8/10 BLE (89.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1213 4P SABS (R1,226,641/year)
Annual Cost Range: R1,415,638 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R14,156,379 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

18 HC 1213 4P

81.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.2%
Power 60.9 kW
Head 27.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

18 HC 1213 4P SABS

79.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.0%
Power 56.0 kW
Head 25.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

250-250-360 4P

76.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.3%
Power 57.2 kW
Head 25.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

16 HC 1264 4P

75.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.0%
Power 59.3 kW
Head 24.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

8 KL

72.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.0%
Power 57.8 kW
Head 24.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-400 4P

71.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.1%
Power 65.5 kW
Head 28.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

8/10 BLE

70.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 89.5%
Power 66.8 kW
Head 33.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

250-250-450 6P

69.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.0%
Power 65.4 kW
Head 24.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

8 WLN 21A

67.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.7%
Power 120.7 kW
Head 50.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

10 ADM

66.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.2%
Power 101.1 kW
Head 46.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection