Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed

66.5 m³/hr Required

17.0 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 66.5 m³/hr

Head: 17.0 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	65-250 2F	WXH-100-240	4/5 ALE	100-200 CAISION	65-200 2F	4506-48171	80-250 2F	7 MC	65-315 2F	65-200 1F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	81.6/100	72.6/100	70.3/100	69.3/100	66.4/100	63.7/100	63.2/100	60.8/100	60.7/100	60.5/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	76.3%	55.7%	72.5%	64.2%	78.0%	61.1%	76.3%	68.9%	70.1%	78.3%
Power Consumption (kW)	5.1	5.5	5.6	6.7	4.0	9.9	4.2	4.6	6.5	10.8
Head Accuracy	21.5m	17.0m	22.4m	23.7m	17.0m	33.3m	17.7m	17.4m	25.0m	46.6m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 76.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 55.7%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 72.5%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 64.2%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 61.1%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 76.3%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 68.9%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 70.1%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 78.3%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

65-250 2F

R111,712/year

5.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

WXH-100-240

R121,216/year

5.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4/5 ALE

R122,399/year

5.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

100-200 CAISION

R146,599/year

6.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-200 2F

R86,505/year

4.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

4506-48171

R216,197/year

9.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

80-250 2F

R92,133/year

4.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

7 MC

R100,477/year

4.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-315 2F

R141,343/year

6.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

65-200 1F

R236,213/year

10.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

65-250 2F

R51,117

Initial + 10-year energy cost

WXH-100-240

R51,212

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4/5 ALE

R51,224

Initial + 10-year energy cost

100-200 CAISION

R51,466

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-200 2F

R50,865

Initial + 10-year energy cost

4506-48171

R52,162

Initial + 10-year energy cost

80-250 2F

R50,921

Initial + 10-year energy cost

7 MC

R51,005

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-315 2F

R51,413

Initial + 10-year energy cost

65-200 1F

R52,362

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

65-250 2F

Baseline

Reference point

WXH-100-240

-R9,505/year

Additional cost vs baseline

4/5 ALE

-R10,687/year

Additional cost vs baseline

100-200 CAISION

-R34,887/year

Additional cost vs baseline

65-200 2F

+R25,207/year

Cost savings vs baseline

4506-48171

-R104,485/year

Additional cost vs baseline

80-250 2F

+R19,579/year

Cost savings vs baseline

7 MC

+R11,235/year

Cost savings vs baseline

65-315 2F

-R29,631/year

Additional cost vs baseline

65-200 1F

-R124,501/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: 65-200 1F (78.3% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F (R86,505/year)

Annual Cost Range: R149,708 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R1,497,084 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

65-250 2F

WXH-100-240

4/5 ALE

100-200 CAISION

65-200 2F

4506-48171

80-250 2F

7 MC

65-315 2F

65-200 1F

Pump Details