Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
64.1 m³/hr Required
15.4 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 64.1 m³/hr
Head: 15.4 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
65-250 2F
80-200 2F
WXH-100-240
65-200 2F
4/5 ALE
100-200 CAISION
80-250 2F
100-80-250 4P
4506-48171
65-200 1F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 78.3/100 73.8/100 69.9/100 67.9/100 64.0/100 63.8/100 60.6/100 59.6/100 59.5/100 59.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 76.5% 71.4% 71.7% 78.0% 71.6% 62.9% 76.3% 76.8% 60.7% 78.9%
Power Consumption (kW) 5.0 3.9 4.0 3.4 5.5 6.6 3.6 4.2 9.8 10.5
Head Accuracy 21.8m 16.1m 16.3m 15.4m 22.6m 23.7m 15.9m 18.4m 34.1m 47.6m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 76.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.9%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
65-250 2F
R109,128/year
5.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-200 2F
R86,483/year
3.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-100-240
R86,790/year
4.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F
R75,533/year
3.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 ALE
R120,647/year
5.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 CAISION
R144,343/year
6.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-250 2F
R79,497/year
3.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-80-250 4P
R91,454/year
4.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4506-48171
R214,751/year
9.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 1F
R230,804/year
10.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
65-250 2F
R51,091
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-200 2F
R50,865
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-100-240
R50,868
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F
R50,755
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 ALE
R51,206
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 CAISION
R51,443
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-250 2F
R50,795
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-80-250 4P
R50,915
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4506-48171
R52,148
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 1F
R52,308
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
65-250 2F
Baseline
Reference point
80-200 2F
+R22,645/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-100-240
+R22,338/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-200 2F
+R33,595/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 ALE
-R11,519/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 CAISION
-R35,215/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-250 2F
+R29,631/year
Cost savings vs baseline
100-80-250 4P
+R17,673/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4506-48171
-R105,624/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-200 1F
-R121,676/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 1F (78.9% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F (R75,533/year)
Annual Cost Range: R155,271 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,552,710 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

65-250 2F

78.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.5%
Power 5.0 kW
Head 21.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

80-200 2F

73.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.4%
Power 3.9 kW
Head 16.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

WXH-100-240

69.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.7%
Power 4.0 kW
Head 16.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

65-200 2F

67.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 3.4 kW
Head 15.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

4/5 ALE

64.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.6%
Power 5.5 kW
Head 22.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

100-200 CAISION

63.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.9%
Power 6.6 kW
Head 23.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

80-250 2F

60.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.3%
Power 3.6 kW
Head 15.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

100-80-250 4P

59.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.8%
Power 4.2 kW
Head 18.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

4506-48171

59.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.7%
Power 9.8 kW
Head 34.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

65-200 1F

59.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.9%
Power 10.5 kW
Head 47.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection