Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
62.7 m³/hr Required
13.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 62.7 m³/hr
Head: 13.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
65-200 2F
65-250 2F
6 HC
WXH-80-210
WXH-100-240
80-200 2F
100-200 CAISION
4/5 ALE
100-80-250 4P
50-160 2F 2P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 85.3/100 74.2/100 73.3/100 73.3/100 69.7/100 63.5/100 59.4/100 59.1/100 57.5/100 57.2/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 78.6% 76.3% 65.0% 53.6% 73.9% 70.9% 62.1% 71.0% 77.2% 73.4%
Power Consumption (kW) 3.2 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.9 6.5 5.4 4.1 6.7
Head Accuracy 14.8m 22.0m 13.0m 13.0m 13.6m 16.2m 23.7m 22.6m 18.6m 29.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 78.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 53.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.4%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
65-200 2F
R70,299/year
3.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F
R107,923/year
4.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 HC
R74,832/year
3.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-80-210
R90,710/year
4.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-100-240
R69,007/year
3.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-200 2F
R85,322/year
3.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 CAISION
R142,985/year
6.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 ALE
R119,289/year
5.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-80-250 4P
R89,943/year
4.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-160 2F 2P
R147,737/year
6.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
65-200 2F
R50,703
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F
R51,079
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 HC
R50,748
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-80-210
R50,907
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-100-240
R50,690
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-200 2F
R50,853
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 CAISION
R51,430
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 ALE
R51,193
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-80-250 4P
R50,899
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-160 2F 2P
R51,477
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
65-200 2F
Baseline
Reference point
65-250 2F
-R37,624/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6 HC
-R4,533/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-80-210
-R20,411/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-100-240
+R1,292/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-200 2F
-R15,023/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 CAISION
-R72,686/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4/5 ALE
-R48,990/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-80-250 4P
-R19,644/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-160 2F 2P
-R77,438/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 2F (78.6% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: WXH-100-240 (R69,007/year)
Annual Cost Range: R78,731 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R787,305 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

65-200 2F

85.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.6%
Power 3.2 kW
Head 14.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

65-250 2F

74.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.3%
Power 4.9 kW
Head 22.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

6 HC

73.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.0%
Power 3.4 kW
Head 13.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

WXH-80-210

73.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 53.6%
Power 4.1 kW
Head 13.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

WXH-100-240

69.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.9%
Power 3.2 kW
Head 13.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

80-200 2F

63.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.9%
Power 3.9 kW
Head 16.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

100-200 CAISION

59.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.1%
Power 6.5 kW
Head 23.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

4/5 ALE

59.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.0%
Power 5.4 kW
Head 22.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

100-80-250 4P

57.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.2%
Power 4.1 kW
Head 18.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

50-160 2F 2P

57.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.4%
Power 6.7 kW
Head 29.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection