Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
60.1 m³/hr Required
15.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 60.1 m³/hr
Head: 15.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
65-250 2F
65-200 2F
100-80-250 4P
80-200 2F
WXH-100-240
4/5 ALE
100-200 CAISION
65-200 1F
50-160 2F 2P
4506-48171
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 77.8/100 71.2/100 70.3/100 68.7/100 65.8/100 60.1/100 59.6/100 59.6/100 58.1/100 55.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 76.0% 76.0% 77.8% 69.9% 70.8% 69.8% 60.7% 78.0% 73.0% 58.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 4.8 3.4 4.0 3.8 3.9 5.3 6.4 10.3 6.6 9.8
Head Accuracy 22.4m 15.9m 18.9m 16.2m 16.9m 22.7m 23.8m 48.8m 29.4m 35.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 58.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
65-250 2F
R105,536/year
4.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F
R75,029/year
3.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-80-250 4P
R87,074/year
4.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-200 2F
R83,132/year
3.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-100-240
R85,519/year
3.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 ALE
R116,661/year
5.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 CAISION
R140,335/year
6.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 1F
R224,519/year
10.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-160 2F 2P
R144,562/year
6.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4506-48171
R215,671/year
9.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
65-250 2F
R51,055
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F
R50,750
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-80-250 4P
R50,871
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-200 2F
R50,831
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-100-240
R50,855
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 ALE
R51,167
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 CAISION
R51,403
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 1F
R52,245
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-160 2F 2P
R51,446
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4506-48171
R52,157
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
65-250 2F
Baseline
Reference point
65-200 2F
+R30,507/year
Cost savings vs baseline
100-80-250 4P
+R18,462/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-200 2F
+R22,404/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-100-240
+R20,017/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 ALE
-R11,125/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 CAISION
-R34,799/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-200 1F
-R118,983/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-160 2F 2P
-R39,026/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4506-48171
-R110,135/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 1F (78.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F (R75,029/year)
Annual Cost Range: R149,489 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,494,894 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

65-250 2F

77.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 4.8 kW
Head 22.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

65-200 2F

71.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 3.4 kW
Head 15.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

100-80-250 4P

70.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.8%
Power 4.0 kW
Head 18.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

80-200 2F

68.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.9%
Power 3.8 kW
Head 16.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

WXH-100-240

65.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.8%
Power 3.9 kW
Head 16.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

4/5 ALE

60.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.8%
Power 5.3 kW
Head 22.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

100-200 CAISION

59.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.7%
Power 6.4 kW
Head 23.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

65-200 1F

59.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 10.3 kW
Head 48.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

50-160 2F 2P

58.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.0%
Power 6.6 kW
Head 29.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

4506-48171

55.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 58.2%
Power 9.8 kW
Head 35.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection