Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

6 Pumps Analyzed
6.0 m³/hr Required
6.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 6.0 m³/hr
Head: 6.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
WXH-50-160
4503-44649
4503-42937
32-200 2F
6 XLC
6 LC
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 52.9/100 44.9/100 34.7/100 29.6/100 21.8/100 18.6/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 41.2% 40.7% 42.8% 49.7% 72.8% 62.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2
Head Accuracy 7.6m 22.2m 15.0m 10.4m 6.8m 6.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 41.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 40.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 42.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 49.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
WXH-50-160
R6,570/year
0.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4503-44649
R19,579/year
0.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4503-42937
R12,571/year
0.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F
R7,534/year
0.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 XLC
R3,351/year
0.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 LC
R3,920/year
0.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
WXH-50-160
R50,066
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4503-44649
R50,196
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4503-42937
R50,126
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F
R50,075
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 XLC
R50,034
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 LC
R50,039
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
WXH-50-160
Baseline
Reference point
4503-44649
-R13,009/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4503-42937
-R6,001/year
Additional cost vs baseline
32-200 2F
-R964/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6 XLC
+R3,219/year
Cost savings vs baseline
6 LC
+R2,650/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 6 XLC (72.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 6 XLC (R3,351/year)
Annual Cost Range: R16,228 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R162,279 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

WXH-50-160

52.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 41.2%
Power 0.3 kW
Head 7.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

4503-44649

44.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 40.7%
Power 0.9 kW
Head 22.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

4503-42937

34.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 42.8%
Power 0.6 kW
Head 15.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

32-200 2F

29.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.7%
Power 0.3 kW
Head 10.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

6 XLC

21.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.8%
Power 0.2 kW
Head 6.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

6 LC

18.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.0%
Power 0.2 kW
Head 6.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection