Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
516.2 m³/hr Required
15.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 516.2 m³/hr
Head: 15.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
250-250-400 6P
FD 300-250-400
200-200-310 4P
18 HC 1214 6P
250-250-540 6P
250-250-360 6P
250-250-360A 4P
250-250-450 6P
200-200-350 4P
16 HC 1262 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 84.7/100 81.9/100 75.7/100 74.4/100 71.6/100 70.8/100 70.3/100 67.3/100 65.9/100 65.2/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 76.8% 84.3% 79.5% 75.0% 81.7% 60.0% 75.5% 79.4% 81.1% 74.9%
Power Consumption (kW) 30.1 37.1 32.0 29.3 42.6 36.6 34.7 38.6 52.0 34.6
Head Accuracy 16.5m 22.3m 18.1m 15.6m 24.7m 15.6m 18.6m 21.8m 30.0m 18.4m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 76.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 74.9%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
250-250-400 6P
R660,110/year
30.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
FD 300-250-400
R813,585/year
37.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 4P
R700,975/year
32.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1214 6P
R640,750/year
29.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-540 6P
R932,283/year
42.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360 6P
R800,949/year
36.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360A 4P
R760,478/year
34.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R844,990/year
38.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-350 4P
R1,138,800/year
52.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1262 4P
R758,353/year
34.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
250-250-400 6P
R56,601
Initial + 10-year energy cost
FD 300-250-400
R58,136
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 4P
R57,010
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1214 6P
R56,408
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-540 6P
R59,323
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360 6P
R58,009
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360A 4P
R57,605
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R58,450
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-350 4P
R61,388
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1262 4P
R57,584
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
250-250-400 6P
Baseline
Reference point
FD 300-250-400
-R153,475/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-310 4P
-R40,865/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1214 6P
+R19,360/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-540 6P
-R272,173/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-360 6P
-R140,839/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-360A 4P
-R100,368/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
-R184,880/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-350 4P
-R478,690/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1262 4P
-R98,243/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: FD 300-250-400 (84.3% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 18 HC 1214 6P (R640,750/year)
Annual Cost Range: R498,050 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R4,980,498 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

250-250-400 6P

84.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.8%
Power 30.1 kW
Head 16.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

FD 300-250-400

81.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.3%
Power 37.1 kW
Head 22.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

200-200-310 4P

75.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.5%
Power 32.0 kW
Head 18.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

18 HC 1214 6P

74.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.0%
Power 29.3 kW
Head 15.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

250-250-540 6P

71.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.7%
Power 42.6 kW
Head 24.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-360 6P

70.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 36.6 kW
Head 15.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

250-250-360A 4P

70.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.5%
Power 34.7 kW
Head 18.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

250-250-450 6P

67.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.4%
Power 38.6 kW
Head 21.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

200-200-350 4P

65.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.1%
Power 52.0 kW
Head 30.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

16 HC 1262 4P

65.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.9%
Power 34.6 kW
Head 18.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection