Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
502.2 m³/hr Required
20.7 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 502.2 m³/hr
Head: 20.7 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
FD 300-250-400
250-250-540 6P
250-250-450 6P
200-200-350 4P
16 HC 1264 4P
16 HC 1262 4P
QW400-26-45
14 HC 1204 4P
14 MC 6970 4P
200-200-310 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 93.6/100 79.3/100 77.5/100 70.9/100 69.8/100 69.4/100 68.7/100 62.5/100 62.0/100 62.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 84.5% 81.4% 79.2% 81.3% 76.4% 78.0% 73.0% 78.0% 84.0% 77.3%
Power Consumption (kW) 36.4 42.2 38.2 51.7 42.1 36.3 43.8 36.3 33.7 36.6
Head Accuracy 22.5m 25.1m 22.1m 30.7m 23.5m 20.7m 23.4m 20.7m 20.7m 20.7m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 84.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.3%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
FD 300-250-400
R797,226/year
36.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-540 6P
R923,676/year
42.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R836,120/year
38.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-350 4P
R1,131,310/year
51.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 4P
R922,603/year
42.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1262 4P
R795,364/year
36.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
QW400-26-45
R959,132/year
43.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1204 4P
R795,364/year
36.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 6970 4P
R738,556/year
33.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 4P
R802,569/year
36.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
FD 300-250-400
R57,972
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-540 6P
R59,237
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R58,361
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-350 4P
R61,313
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 4P
R59,226
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1262 4P
R57,954
Initial + 10-year energy cost
QW400-26-45
R59,591
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1204 4P
R57,954
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 6970 4P
R57,386
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 4P
R58,026
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
FD 300-250-400
Baseline
Reference point
250-250-540 6P
-R126,451/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
-R38,894/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-350 4P
-R334,084/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1264 4P
-R125,378/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1262 4P
+R1,862/year
Cost savings vs baseline
QW400-26-45
-R161,907/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 HC 1204 4P
+R1,862/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14 MC 6970 4P
+R58,670/year
Cost savings vs baseline
200-200-310 4P
-R5,344/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: FD 300-250-400 (84.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 14 MC 6970 4P (R738,556/year)
Annual Cost Range: R392,755 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R3,927,546 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

FD 300-250-400

93.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.5%
Power 36.4 kW
Head 22.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

250-250-540 6P

79.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.4%
Power 42.2 kW
Head 25.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

250-250-450 6P

77.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.2%
Power 38.2 kW
Head 22.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

200-200-350 4P

70.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.3%
Power 51.7 kW
Head 30.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

16 HC 1264 4P

69.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.4%
Power 42.1 kW
Head 23.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

16 HC 1262 4P

69.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 36.3 kW
Head 20.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

QW400-26-45

68.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.0%
Power 43.8 kW
Head 23.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

14 HC 1204 4P

62.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 36.3 kW
Head 20.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

14 MC 6970 4P

62.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.0%
Power 33.7 kW
Head 20.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

200-200-310 4P

62.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.3%
Power 36.6 kW
Head 20.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection