Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
491.3 m³/hr Required
9.4 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 491.3 m³/hr
Head: 9.4 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
250-250-360 6P
18 HC 1213 6P
FD 300-250-400
16 HC 1264 6P
8312-14 313T 4P
250-250-400A 6P
14 HC 1204 4P
200-200-310 4P
18 XHC 2186 6P
250-250-540 6P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 79.4/100 71.7/100 71.2/100 68.3/100 67.6/100 65.7/100 64.9/100 63.9/100 62.5/100 59.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 80.4% 81.6% 84.2% 79.0% 83.6% 60.0% 75.2% 80.0% 70.0% 81.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 20.9 18.6 36.0 15.9 19.1 21.0 24.9 31.8 18.0 41.8
Head Accuracy 12.5m 11.3m 22.6m 9.4m 11.9m 9.4m 14.0m 19.0m 9.4m 25.4m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 80.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 83.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
250-250-360 6P
R457,206/year
20.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 6P
R406,376/year
18.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
FD 300-250-400
R787,349/year
36.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 6P
R348,867/year
15.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-14 313T 4P
R418,093/year
19.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-400A 6P
R459,331/year
21.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1204 4P
R546,317/year
24.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 4P
R697,143/year
31.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 XHC 2186 6P
R393,674/year
18.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-540 6P
R916,384/year
41.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
250-250-360 6P
R54,572
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 6P
R54,064
Initial + 10-year energy cost
FD 300-250-400
R57,873
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 6P
R53,489
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-14 313T 4P
R54,181
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-400A 6P
R54,593
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1204 4P
R55,463
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 4P
R56,971
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 XHC 2186 6P
R53,937
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-540 6P
R59,164
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
250-250-360 6P
Baseline
Reference point
18 HC 1213 6P
+R50,830/year
Cost savings vs baseline
FD 300-250-400
-R330,142/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1264 6P
+R108,339/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8312-14 313T 4P
+R39,113/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-400A 6P
-R2,124/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 HC 1204 4P
-R89,111/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-310 4P
-R239,936/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 XHC 2186 6P
+R63,532/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-540 6P
-R459,177/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: FD 300-250-400 (84.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 16 HC 1264 6P (R348,867/year)
Annual Cost Range: R567,517 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R5,675,166 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

250-250-360 6P

79.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.4%
Power 20.9 kW
Head 12.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

18 HC 1213 6P

71.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.6%
Power 18.6 kW
Head 11.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

FD 300-250-400

71.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.2%
Power 36.0 kW
Head 22.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

16 HC 1264 6P

68.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.0%
Power 15.9 kW
Head 9.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

8312-14 313T 4P

67.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 83.6%
Power 19.1 kW
Head 11.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

250-250-400A 6P

65.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 21.0 kW
Head 9.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

14 HC 1204 4P

64.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 24.9 kW
Head 14.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

200-200-310 4P

63.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 31.8 kW
Head 19.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

18 XHC 2186 6P

62.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 18.0 kW
Head 9.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

250-250-540 6P

59.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.2%
Power 41.8 kW
Head 25.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection