Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
46.8 m³/hr Required
23.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 46.8 m³/hr
Head: 23.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
100-80-250 4P
2 K
4505-48190
65-250 2F
WXH-65-185 2P
65-200 1F
50-250 2F
100-200 CAISION
80-50-315 2P
65-160 2F 2P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 82.3/100 71.7/100 64.8/100 63.0/100 59.2/100 58.6/100 56.6/100 53.7/100 49.7/100 47.8/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 68.3% 59.8% 59.2% 72.0% 63.0% 73.9% 73.0% 53.4% 60.2% 59.5%
Power Consumption (kW) 5.4 5.4 8.9 4.2 7.7 8.9 4.2 5.7 11.7 5.1
Head Accuracy 29.1m 25.5m 41.2m 23.8m 37.9m 51.8m 23.8m 23.8m 55.4m 23.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 68.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 59.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 59.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 53.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 59.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
100-80-250 4P
R119,070/year
5.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
2 K
R119,180/year
5.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4505-48190
R194,581/year
8.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F
R92,330/year
4.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-65-185 2P
R168,170/year
7.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 1F
R195,720/year
8.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F
R91,060/year
4.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 CAISION
R124,545/year
5.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 2P
R257,062/year
11.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-160 2F 2P
R111,931/year
5.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
100-80-250 4P
R51,191
Initial + 10-year energy cost
2 K
R51,192
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4505-48190
R51,946
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F
R50,923
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-65-185 2P
R51,682
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 1F
R51,957
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F
R50,911
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 CAISION
R51,245
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 2P
R52,571
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-160 2F 2P
R51,119
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
100-80-250 4P
Baseline
Reference point
2 K
-R109/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4505-48190
-R75,511/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-250 2F
+R26,740/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-65-185 2P
-R49,100/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-200 1F
-R76,650/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F
+R28,010/year
Cost savings vs baseline
100-200 CAISION
-R5,475/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 2P
-R137,992/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-160 2F 2P
+R7,139/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 1F (73.9% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 50-250 2F (R91,060/year)
Annual Cost Range: R166,002 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,660,020 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

100-80-250 4P

82.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.3%
Power 5.4 kW
Head 29.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

2 K

71.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 59.8%
Power 5.4 kW
Head 25.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

4505-48190

64.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 59.2%
Power 8.9 kW
Head 41.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

65-250 2F

63.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.0%
Power 4.2 kW
Head 23.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

WXH-65-185 2P

59.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.0%
Power 7.7 kW
Head 37.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

65-200 1F

58.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.9%
Power 8.9 kW
Head 51.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

50-250 2F

56.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.0%
Power 4.2 kW
Head 23.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

100-200 CAISION

53.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 53.4%
Power 5.7 kW
Head 23.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

80-50-315 2P

49.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.2%
Power 11.7 kW
Head 55.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

65-160 2F 2P

47.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 59.5%
Power 5.1 kW
Head 23.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection