Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
455.8 m³/hr Required
18.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 455.8 m³/hr
Head: 18.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
FD 300-250-400
200-200-310 4P
14 MC 6970 4P
16 HC 1262 4P
250-250-360A 4P
14 HC 1204 4P
250-250-540 6P
200-200-350 4P
14 MC 757 4P
250-250-450 6P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 85.7/100 85.4/100 74.6/100 74.1/100 73.9/100 73.3/100 72.1/100 71.5/100 69.5/100 64.6/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 83.1% 80.5% 81.0% 77.4% 74.3% 78.0% 80.4% 80.3% 65.0% 76.6%
Power Consumption (kW) 34.5 31.3 30.2 34.1 33.2 30.1 40.6 41.0 36.1 36.9
Head Accuracy 23.1m 20.3m 19.7m 21.2m 19.9m 18.9m 26.3m 26.5m 18.9m 22.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 83.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 74.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.6%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
FD 300-250-400
R755,681/year
34.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 4P
R685,777/year
31.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 6970 4P
R660,570/year
30.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1262 4P
R746,352/year
34.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-360A 4P
R726,752/year
33.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1204 4P
R659,102/year
30.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-540 6P
R889,250/year
40.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-350 4P
R897,265/year
41.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 757 4P
R790,918/year
36.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-250-450 6P
R807,782/year
36.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
FD 300-250-400
R57,557
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 4P
R56,858
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 6970 4P
R56,606
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1262 4P
R57,464
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-360A 4P
R57,268
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1204 4P
R56,591
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-540 6P
R58,892
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-350 4P
R58,973
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 757 4P
R57,909
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-250-450 6P
R58,078
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
FD 300-250-400
Baseline
Reference point
200-200-310 4P
+R69,905/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14 MC 6970 4P
+R95,112/year
Cost savings vs baseline
16 HC 1262 4P
+R9,329/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-360A 4P
+R28,930/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14 HC 1204 4P
+R96,579/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-250-540 6P
-R133,568/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-350 4P
-R141,583/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 MC 757 4P
-R35,237/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-250-450 6P
-R52,100/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: FD 300-250-400 (83.1% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 14 HC 1204 4P (R659,102/year)
Annual Cost Range: R238,162 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,381,625 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

FD 300-250-400

85.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 83.1%
Power 34.5 kW
Head 23.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

200-200-310 4P

85.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.5%
Power 31.3 kW
Head 20.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

14 MC 6970 4P

74.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.0%
Power 30.2 kW
Head 19.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

16 HC 1262 4P

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.4%
Power 34.1 kW
Head 21.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

250-250-360A 4P

73.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.3%
Power 33.2 kW
Head 19.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

14 HC 1204 4P

73.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 30.1 kW
Head 18.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

250-250-540 6P

72.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.4%
Power 40.6 kW
Head 26.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

200-200-350 4P

71.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.3%
Power 41.0 kW
Head 26.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

14 MC 757 4P

69.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.0%
Power 36.1 kW
Head 18.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

250-250-450 6P

64.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.6%
Power 36.9 kW
Head 22.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection