Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
45.0 m³/hr Required
44.7 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 45.0 m³/hr
Head: 44.7 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
65-200 1F
WXH-65-185 2P
80-50-315 2P
2.5 K
50-250 2F 2P
WXH-34-35-100
WXH-64-35-100
50-160 2F 2P
65-200 2F 2P
4/5 CME
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 72.0/100 70.6/100 63.3/100 55.5/100 48.3/100 47.7/100 47.7/100 47.3/100 46.6/100 42.6/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 73.3% 41.9% 59.8% 53.5% 66.9% 57.5% 57.5% 65.0% 55.2% 60.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 8.7 13.1 11.5 11.0 11.7 10.9 10.9 8.4 10.2 9.1
Head Accuracy 52.1m 44.7m 56.3m 47.8m 63.6m 51.0m 51.0m 44.7m 46.1m 44.7m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 73.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 41.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 59.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 53.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 57.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 57.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
65-200 1F
R190,990/year
8.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-65-185 2P
R286,299/year
13.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 2P
R252,682/year
11.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
2.5 K
R240,068/year
11.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F 2P
R255,332/year
11.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-34-35-100
R237,987/year
10.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-35-100
R237,987/year
10.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-160 2F 2P
R184,683/year
8.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R224,278/year
10.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 CME
R200,078/year
9.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
65-200 1F
R51,910
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-65-185 2P
R52,863
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 2P
R52,527
Initial + 10-year energy cost
2.5 K
R52,401
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F 2P
R52,553
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-34-35-100
R52,380
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-35-100
R52,380
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-160 2F 2P
R51,847
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R52,243
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 CME
R52,001
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
65-200 1F
Baseline
Reference point
WXH-65-185 2P
-R95,309/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 2P
-R61,692/year
Additional cost vs baseline
2.5 K
-R49,078/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F 2P
-R64,342/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-34-35-100
-R46,997/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-35-100
-R46,997/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-160 2F 2P
+R6,307/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
-R33,288/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4/5 CME
-R9,088/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 1F (73.3% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 50-160 2F 2P (R184,683/year)
Annual Cost Range: R101,616 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,016,160 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

65-200 1F

72.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.3%
Power 8.7 kW
Head 52.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

WXH-65-185 2P

70.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 41.9%
Power 13.1 kW
Head 44.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

80-50-315 2P

63.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 59.8%
Power 11.5 kW
Head 56.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

2.5 K

55.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 53.5%
Power 11.0 kW
Head 47.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

50-250 2F 2P

48.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.9%
Power 11.7 kW
Head 63.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

WXH-34-35-100

47.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 57.5%
Power 10.9 kW
Head 51.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

WXH-64-35-100

47.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 57.5%
Power 10.9 kW
Head 51.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

50-160 2F 2P

47.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.0%
Power 8.4 kW
Head 44.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

65-200 2F 2P

46.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.2%
Power 10.2 kW
Head 46.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

4/5 CME

42.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 9.1 kW
Head 44.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection