Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
436.0 m³/hr Required
163.3 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 436.0 m³/hr
Head: 163.3 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
PL 200 AS
5/6 MEDI 2P
5/6 MEDIVANE 2P
6/8 GME
8 B/B
PJ 100
6/8 EME
PL 200 AN
8X10X13 4S
8/8 GME 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 78.0/100 72.0/100 72.0/100 67.7/100 67.5/100 67.2/100 66.5/100 63.2/100 61.1/100 55.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 80.2% 67.0% 67.0% 78.5% 70.0% 71.6% 68.5% 79.0% 82.2% 78.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 251.9 289.6 289.6 247.2 277.2 287.7 283.2 245.6 259.1 248.7
Head Accuracy 170.1m 163.3m 163.3m 163.3m 163.3m 173.3m 163.3m 163.3m 179.4m 163.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
PL 200 AS
R5,516,632/year
251.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
5/6 MEDI 2P
R6,341,736/year
289.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
5/6 MEDIVANE 2P
R6,341,736/year
289.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6/8 GME
R5,414,775/year
247.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8 B/B
R6,069,957/year
277.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 100
R6,300,411/year
287.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6/8 EME
R6,201,051/year
283.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 200 AN
R5,378,443/year
245.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 4S
R5,675,363/year
259.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8/8 GME 4P
R5,447,384/year
248.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
PL 200 AS
R105,166
Initial + 10-year energy cost
5/6 MEDI 2P
R113,417
Initial + 10-year energy cost
5/6 MEDIVANE 2P
R113,417
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6/8 GME
R104,148
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8 B/B
R110,700
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 100
R113,004
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6/8 EME
R112,011
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 200 AN
R103,784
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 4S
R106,754
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8/8 GME 4P
R104,474
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
PL 200 AS
Baseline
Reference point
5/6 MEDI 2P
-R825,104/year
Additional cost vs baseline
5/6 MEDIVANE 2P
-R825,104/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6/8 GME
+R101,857/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8 B/B
-R553,325/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PJ 100
-R783,779/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6/8 EME
-R684,419/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 200 AN
+R138,189/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8X10X13 4S
-R158,731/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8/8 GME 4P
+R69,248/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 8X10X13 4S (82.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: PL 200 AN (R5,378,443/year)
Annual Cost Range: R963,293 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R9,632,934 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

PL 200 AS

78.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 251.9 kW
Head 170.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

5/6 MEDI 2P

72.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.0%
Power 289.6 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

5/6 MEDIVANE 2P

72.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.0%
Power 289.6 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

6/8 GME

67.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.5%
Power 247.2 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

8 B/B

67.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 277.2 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

PJ 100

67.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.6%
Power 287.7 kW
Head 173.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

6/8 EME

66.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.5%
Power 283.2 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

PL 200 AN

63.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.0%
Power 245.6 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

8X10X13 4S

61.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.2%
Power 259.1 kW
Head 179.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

8/8 GME 4P

55.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 248.7 kW
Head 163.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection