Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
436.0 m³/hr Required
10.4 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 436.0 m³/hr
Head: 10.4 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
250-250-360 6P
200-200-310A 4P
8312-14 313T 4P
16 HC 1264 6P
14 HC 1204 4P
18 HC 1213 6P
FD 300-250-400
14 MC 757 4P
14 HC 1203 4P
200-200-310 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 77.2/100 74.1/100 73.7/100 71.2/100 70.6/100 70.4/100 69.7/100 66.8/100 63.1/100 60.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 80.2% 73.2% 83.8% 75.0% 77.4% 81.1% 82.4% 70.9% 77.0% 80.3%
Power Consumption (kW) 15.8 16.9 17.4 16.5 24.5 18.4 33.6 17.5 16.0 27.5
Head Accuracy 10.7m 10.4m 12.3m 10.4m 15.9m 12.6m 23.3m 10.4m 10.4m 18.6m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 83.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.3%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
250-250-360 6P
R345,166/year
15.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310A 4P
R370,373/year
16.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-14 313T 4P
R380,863/year
17.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1264 6P
R360,802/year
16.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1204 4P
R535,608/year
24.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
18 HC 1213 6P
R403,770/year
18.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
FD 300-250-400
R736,606/year
33.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 757 4P
R382,943/year
17.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1203 4P
R351,429/year
16.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 4P
R602,973/year
27.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
250-250-360 6P
R53,452
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310A 4P
R53,704
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-14 313T 4P
R53,809
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1264 6P
R53,608
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1204 4P
R55,356
Initial + 10-year energy cost
18 HC 1213 6P
R54,038
Initial + 10-year energy cost
FD 300-250-400
R57,366
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 757 4P
R53,829
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1203 4P
R53,514
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 4P
R56,030
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
250-250-360 6P
Baseline
Reference point
200-200-310A 4P
-R25,207/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8312-14 313T 4P
-R35,697/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1264 6P
-R15,637/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 HC 1204 4P
-R190,442/year
Additional cost vs baseline
18 HC 1213 6P
-R58,604/year
Additional cost vs baseline
FD 300-250-400
-R391,441/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 MC 757 4P
-R37,778/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 HC 1203 4P
-R6,263/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-310 4P
-R257,807/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 8312-14 313T 4P (83.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 250-250-360 6P (R345,166/year)
Annual Cost Range: R391,441 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R3,914,406 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

250-250-360 6P

77.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 15.8 kW
Head 10.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

200-200-310A 4P

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.2%
Power 16.9 kW
Head 10.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

8312-14 313T 4P

73.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 83.8%
Power 17.4 kW
Head 12.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

16 HC 1264 6P

71.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.0%
Power 16.5 kW
Head 10.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

14 HC 1204 4P

70.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.4%
Power 24.5 kW
Head 15.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

18 HC 1213 6P

70.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.1%
Power 18.4 kW
Head 12.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

FD 300-250-400

69.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.4%
Power 33.6 kW
Head 23.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

14 MC 757 4P

66.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.9%
Power 17.5 kW
Head 10.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

14 HC 1203 4P

63.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.0%
Power 16.0 kW
Head 10.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

200-200-310 4P

60.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.3%
Power 27.5 kW
Head 18.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection