Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
38.5 m³/hr Required
64.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 38.5 m³/hr
Head: 64.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
HMS 50/4
1.5X2X10.5 H
80-50-315 2P
50-200 2F 2P
4/5 DME
65-250 2F 2P
50-250 2F 2P
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
65-200 2F 2P
PL 80 AS
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 49.5/100 49.4/100 47.6/100 45.7/100 42.9/100 41.7/100 40.0/100 39.8/100 35.0/100 33.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 68.1% 46.0% 51.6% 61.6% 52.0% 50.0% 60.0% 72.2% 50.0% 47.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 19.2 14.7 21.6 12.2 14.4 13.6 13.6 9.4 13.6 16.2
Head Accuracy 124.8m 64.6m 106.4m 71.4m 71.3m 64.6m 77.8m 64.6m 64.6m 74.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 68.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 46.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 51.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 61.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 52.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 47.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
HMS 50/4
R420,830/year
19.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
1.5X2X10.5 H
R322,653/year
14.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 2P
R473,763/year
21.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-200 2F 2P
R266,129/year
12.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 DME
R314,791/year
14.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F 2P
R296,854/year
13.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F 2P
R298,125/year
13.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R205,597/year
9.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R296,854/year
13.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 80 AS
R355,328/year
16.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
HMS 50/4
R54,208
Initial + 10-year energy cost
1.5X2X10.5 H
R53,227
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 2P
R54,738
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-200 2F 2P
R52,661
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 DME
R53,148
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F 2P
R52,969
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F 2P
R52,981
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R52,056
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R52,969
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 80 AS
R53,553
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
HMS 50/4
Baseline
Reference point
1.5X2X10.5 H
+R98,178/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-50-315 2P
-R52,932/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-200 2F 2P
+R154,702/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 DME
+R106,040/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-250 2F 2P
+R123,976/year
Cost savings vs baseline
50-250 2F 2P
+R122,706/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
+R215,233/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
+R123,976/year
Cost savings vs baseline
PL 80 AS
+R65,503/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 4/5 2 STAGE MEDI (72.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 4/5 2 STAGE MEDI (R205,597/year)
Annual Cost Range: R268,165 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,681,655 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

HMS 50/4

49.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.1%
Power 19.2 kW
Head 124.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

1.5X2X10.5 H

49.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 46.0%
Power 14.7 kW
Head 64.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

80-50-315 2P

47.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 51.6%
Power 21.6 kW
Head 106.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

50-200 2F 2P

45.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 61.6%
Power 12.2 kW
Head 71.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

4/5 DME

42.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 52.0%
Power 14.4 kW
Head 71.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

65-250 2F 2P

41.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 13.6 kW
Head 64.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

50-250 2F 2P

40.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 13.6 kW
Head 77.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

4/5 2 STAGE MEDI

39.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.2%
Power 9.4 kW
Head 64.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

65-200 2F 2P

35.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 13.6 kW
Head 64.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

PL 80 AS

33.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 47.8%
Power 16.2 kW
Head 74.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection