Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
34.0 m³/hr Required
65.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 34.0 m³/hr
Head: 65.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
1.5X2X10.5 H
HMS 50/4
50-200 2F 2P
65-250 2F 2P
80-50-315 2P
50-250 2F 2P
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
32-200 2F 2P
4/5 DME
65-200 2F 2P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 69.4/100 54.3/100 44.9/100 42.1/100 39.4/100 39.2/100 39.1/100 38.5/100 38.0/100 34.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 48.9% 68.2% 58.2% 50.0% 49.4% 56.5% 72.2% 63.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 14.5 18.1 11.4 12.0 20.3 12.8 8.3 9.6 12.0 12.0
Head Accuracy 76.6m 133.2m 71.5m 65.0m 108.4m 78.0m 65.0m 65.0m 65.0m 65.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 48.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 58.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 49.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 56.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
1.5X2X10.5 H
R318,098/year
14.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
HMS 50/4
R396,543/year
18.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-200 2F 2P
R249,594/year
11.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F 2P
R263,786/year
12.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 2P
R444,942/year
20.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F 2P
R280,298/year
12.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R182,690/year
8.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F 2P
R209,342/year
9.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 DME
R263,786/year
12.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R263,786/year
12.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
1.5X2X10.5 H
R53,181
Initial + 10-year energy cost
HMS 50/4
R53,965
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-200 2F 2P
R52,496
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F 2P
R52,638
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 2P
R54,449
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F 2P
R52,803
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R51,827
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F 2P
R52,093
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 DME
R52,638
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R52,638
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
1.5X2X10.5 H
Baseline
Reference point
HMS 50/4
-R78,446/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-200 2F 2P
+R68,503/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-250 2F 2P
+R54,312/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-50-315 2P
-R126,845/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F 2P
+R37,799/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
+R135,408/year
Cost savings vs baseline
32-200 2F 2P
+R108,755/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 DME
+R54,312/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
+R54,312/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 4/5 2 STAGE MEDI (72.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 4/5 2 STAGE MEDI (R182,690/year)
Annual Cost Range: R262,253 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,622,525 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

1.5X2X10.5 H

69.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 48.9%
Power 14.5 kW
Head 76.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

HMS 50/4

54.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.2%
Power 18.1 kW
Head 133.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

50-200 2F 2P

44.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 58.2%
Power 11.4 kW
Head 71.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

65-250 2F 2P

42.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 12.0 kW
Head 65.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

80-50-315 2P

39.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.4%
Power 20.3 kW
Head 108.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

50-250 2F 2P

39.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 56.5%
Power 12.8 kW
Head 78.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

4/5 2 STAGE MEDI

39.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.2%
Power 8.3 kW
Head 65.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

32-200 2F 2P

38.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.0%
Power 9.6 kW
Head 65.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

4/5 DME

38.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 12.0 kW
Head 65.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

65-200 2F 2P

34.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 12.0 kW
Head 65.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection