Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
336.9 m³/hr Required
6.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 336.9 m³/hr
Head: 6.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
250-250-360A 6P
200-200-310 6P
150-200 2F
200-200-250A 4P
16 HC 1262 6P
12 HC 4P
14 HC 1203 4P
14 MC 757 4P
200-200-310A 4P
150-250 2F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 82.7/100 74.0/100 73.9/100 70.1/100 69.2/100 67.7/100 67.0/100 65.6/100 64.4/100 63.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 75.2% 78.1% 85.3% 72.4% 70.0% 77.8% 80.2% 81.7% 74.9% 84.1%
Power Consumption (kW) 9.6 9.1 11.0 9.8 8.9 10.1 16.6 17.2 16.3 23.3
Head Accuracy 7.8m 7.7m 10.2m 7.7m 6.8m 8.6m 14.5m 15.3m 13.3m 21.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 74.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.1%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
250-250-360A 6P
R209,342/year
9.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310 6P
R198,217/year
9.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-200 2F
R241,053/year
11.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-250A 4P
R213,722/year
9.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1262 6P
R195,304/year
8.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 HC 4P
R221,168/year
10.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1203 4P
R363,365/year
16.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 757 4P
R376,921/year
17.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-310A 4P
R357,999/year
16.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-250 2F
R509,876/year
23.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
250-250-360A 6P
R52,093
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310 6P
R51,982
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-200 2F
R52,411
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-250A 4P
R52,137
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1262 6P
R51,953
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 HC 4P
R52,212
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1203 4P
R53,634
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 757 4P
R53,769
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-310A 4P
R53,580
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-250 2F
R55,099
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
250-250-360A 6P
Baseline
Reference point
200-200-310 6P
+R11,125/year
Cost savings vs baseline
150-200 2F
-R31,711/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-250A 4P
-R4,380/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1262 6P
+R14,038/year
Cost savings vs baseline
12 HC 4P
-R11,826/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 HC 1203 4P
-R154,023/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 MC 757 4P
-R167,579/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-310A 4P
-R148,657/year
Additional cost vs baseline
150-250 2F
-R300,534/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 150-200 2F (85.3% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 16 HC 1262 6P (R195,304/year)
Annual Cost Range: R314,572 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R3,145,716 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

250-250-360A 6P

82.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 9.6 kW
Head 7.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

200-200-310 6P

74.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.1%
Power 9.1 kW
Head 7.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

150-200 2F

73.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.3%
Power 11.0 kW
Head 10.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

200-200-250A 4P

70.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.4%
Power 9.8 kW
Head 7.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

16 HC 1262 6P

69.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 8.9 kW
Head 6.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

12 HC 4P

67.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.8%
Power 10.1 kW
Head 8.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

14 HC 1203 4P

67.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 16.6 kW
Head 14.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

14 MC 757 4P

65.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.7%
Power 17.2 kW
Head 15.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

200-200-310A 4P

64.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.9%
Power 16.3 kW
Head 13.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

150-250 2F

63.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.1%
Power 23.3 kW
Head 21.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection