Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
33.0 m³/hr Required
39.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 33.0 m³/hr
Head: 39.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
WXH-64-40-65
50-315 2F
4505-48190
1.5X2X8.5 H
WXH-65-185 2P
1.5X2X10.5 H
80-50-315 4P
32-200 2F 2P
50-160 2F 2P
HMS 50/4
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 84.4/100 82.6/100 74.5/100 74.1/100 71.2/100 57.7/100 56.9/100 52.4/100 44.8/100 40.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 60.7% 62.0% 56.7% 52.5% 56.1% 49.1% 50.0% 61.5% 54.3% 68.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 5.8 5.7 7.5 7.6 6.9 14.3 7.0 7.8 7.0 17.8
Head Accuracy 39.0m 39.0m 47.2m 44.4m 42.8m 78.4m 39.0m 53.5m 42.1m 135.1m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 60.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 56.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 52.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 56.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 49.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 61.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 54.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
WXH-64-40-65
R126,604/year
5.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-315 2F
R123,888/year
5.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4505-48190
R163,746/year
7.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
1.5X2X8.5 H
R166,681/year
7.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-65-185 2P
R150,212/year
6.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
1.5X2X10.5 H
R314,199/year
14.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 4P
R153,607/year
7.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F 2P
R171,477/year
7.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-160 2F 2P
R152,774/year
7.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
HMS 50/4
R390,236/year
17.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
WXH-64-40-65
R51,266
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-315 2F
R51,239
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4505-48190
R51,637
Initial + 10-year energy cost
1.5X2X8.5 H
R51,667
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-65-185 2P
R51,502
Initial + 10-year energy cost
1.5X2X10.5 H
R53,142
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 4P
R51,536
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F 2P
R51,715
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-160 2F 2P
R51,528
Initial + 10-year energy cost
HMS 50/4
R53,902
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
WXH-64-40-65
Baseline
Reference point
50-315 2F
+R2,716/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4505-48190
-R37,142/year
Additional cost vs baseline
1.5X2X8.5 H
-R40,077/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-65-185 2P
-R23,608/year
Additional cost vs baseline
1.5X2X10.5 H
-R187,595/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 4P
-R27,003/year
Additional cost vs baseline
32-200 2F 2P
-R44,873/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-160 2F 2P
-R26,170/year
Additional cost vs baseline
HMS 50/4
-R263,632/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: HMS 50/4 (68.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 50-315 2F (R123,888/year)
Annual Cost Range: R266,348 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,663,478 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

WXH-64-40-65

84.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.7%
Power 5.8 kW
Head 39.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

50-315 2F

82.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.0%
Power 5.7 kW
Head 39.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

4505-48190

74.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 56.7%
Power 7.5 kW
Head 47.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

1.5X2X8.5 H

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 52.5%
Power 7.6 kW
Head 44.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

WXH-65-185 2P

71.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 56.1%
Power 6.9 kW
Head 42.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

1.5X2X10.5 H

57.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.1%
Power 14.3 kW
Head 78.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

80-50-315 4P

56.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 7.0 kW
Head 39.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

32-200 2F 2P

52.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 61.5%
Power 7.8 kW
Head 53.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

50-160 2F 2P

44.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 54.3%
Power 7.0 kW
Head 42.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

HMS 50/4

40.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.2%
Power 17.8 kW
Head 135.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection