Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed

320.0 m³/hr Required

163.0 m Head Required

Application Requirements

Flow Rate: 320.0 m³/hr

Head: 163.0 m

Application: Water Supply

Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

Sort by:

Parameter	6/8 EME	PL 200 AN	PL 200 AS	5/6 MEDI 2P	5/6 MEDIVANE 2P	6/8 GME	8 WLN 29B	PJ 100	8 B/B	PL 150 AS
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score	78.5/100	69.8/100	59.9/100	58.4/100	58.4/100	52.9/100	43.9/100	43.8/100	42.8/100	40.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%)	68.5%	76.7%	72.8%	67.0%	67.0%	69.2%	74.5%	69.0%	61.5%	66.7%
Power Consumption (kW)	207.4	193.8	197.9	212.1	212.1	205.5	190.8	221.8	231.1	213.3
Head Accuracy	163.0m	170.4m	165.2m	163.0m	163.0m	163.0m	163.0m	175.4m	163.0m	163.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range	Within Range
Selection Reason	Efficiency: 68.5%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 76.7%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 72.8%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 69.2%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 74.5%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 69.0%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 61.5%, Head error: 0.0%	Efficiency: 66.7%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report	Report

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost

6/8 EME

R4,542,870/year

207.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

PL 200 AN

R4,244,351/year

193.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

PL 200 AS

R4,334,032/year

197.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

5/6 MEDI 2P

R4,645,932/year

212.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

5/6 MEDIVANE 2P

R4,645,932/year

212.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

6/8 GME

R4,499,530/year

205.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

8 WLN 29B

R4,178,235/year

190.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

PJ 100

R4,856,763/year

221.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

8 B/B

R5,061,418/year

231.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

PL 150 AS

R4,670,328/year

213.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh

10-Year Total Cost

6/8 EME

R95,429

Initial + 10-year energy cost

PL 200 AN

R92,444

Initial + 10-year energy cost

PL 200 AS

R93,340

Initial + 10-year energy cost

5/6 MEDI 2P

R96,459

Initial + 10-year energy cost

5/6 MEDIVANE 2P

R96,459

Initial + 10-year energy cost

6/8 GME

R94,995

Initial + 10-year energy cost

8 WLN 29B

R91,782

Initial + 10-year energy cost

PJ 100

R98,568

Initial + 10-year energy cost

8 B/B

R100,614

Initial + 10-year energy cost

PL 150 AS

R96,703

Initial + 10-year energy cost

Annual Cost Comparison

6/8 EME

Baseline

Reference point

PL 200 AN

+R298,519/year

Cost savings vs baseline

PL 200 AS

+R208,838/year

Cost savings vs baseline

5/6 MEDI 2P

-R103,061/year

Additional cost vs baseline

5/6 MEDIVANE 2P

-R103,061/year

Additional cost vs baseline

6/8 GME

+R43,340/year

Cost savings vs baseline

8 WLN 29B

+R364,635/year

Cost savings vs baseline

PJ 100

-R313,893/year

Additional cost vs baseline

8 B/B

-R518,548/year

Additional cost vs baseline

PL 150 AS

-R127,458/year

Additional cost vs baseline

Cost Analysis Summary

Most Efficient: PL 200 AN (76.7% efficiency)

Lowest Operating Cost: 8 WLN 29B (R4,178,235/year)

Annual Cost Range: R883,183 difference between highest and lowest

10-Year Impact: R8,831,832 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

Download Comparison Report New Selection

Pump Performance Comparison

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Annual Energy Cost

10-Year Total Cost

Annual Cost Comparison

Cost Analysis Summary

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

6/8 EME

PL 200 AN

PL 200 AS

5/6 MEDI 2P

5/6 MEDIVANE 2P

6/8 GME

8 WLN 29B

PJ 100

8 B/B

PL 150 AS

Pump Details