Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
313.9 m³/hr Required
15.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 313.9 m³/hr
Head: 15.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
14 MC 757 4P
14 HC 1203 4P
14 MC 756 4P
150-250 2F
125-250 2F
125-100-315 4P
200-150-315 4P
14 MC 755 4P
XF18
6/8 ALE
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 87.2/100 87.2/100 86.9/100 82.5/100 81.9/100 79.6/100 79.6/100 76.7/100 75.1/100 74.1/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 80.1% 80.0% 80.0% 84.9% 84.0% 75.2% 79.1% 75.0% 80.6% 81.7%
Power Consumption (kW) 17.4 16.9 16.9 22.6 17.7 24.3 21.5 18.0 27.0 26.0
Head Accuracy 16.2m 15.8m 15.8m 22.4m 17.4m 21.4m 19.9m 15.8m 25.4m 24.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 80.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 84.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.7%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
14 MC 757 4P
R380,009/year
17.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 HC 1203 4P
R369,979/year
16.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 756 4P
R369,979/year
16.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-250 2F
R494,371/year
22.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-250 2F
R388,550/year
17.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-100-315 4P
R531,995/year
24.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-150-315 4P
R471,419/year
21.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 755 4P
R394,638/year
18.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
XF18
R590,993/year
27.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6/8 ALE
R569,619/year
26.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
14 MC 757 4P
R53,800
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 HC 1203 4P
R53,700
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 756 4P
R53,700
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-250 2F
R54,944
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-250 2F
R53,885
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-100-315 4P
R55,320
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-150-315 4P
R54,714
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 755 4P
R53,946
Initial + 10-year energy cost
XF18
R55,910
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6/8 ALE
R55,696
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
14 MC 757 4P
Baseline
Reference point
14 HC 1203 4P
+R10,030/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14 MC 756 4P
+R10,030/year
Cost savings vs baseline
150-250 2F
-R114,362/year
Additional cost vs baseline
125-250 2F
-R8,541/year
Additional cost vs baseline
125-100-315 4P
-R151,986/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-150-315 4P
-R91,411/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 MC 755 4P
-R14,629/year
Additional cost vs baseline
XF18
-R210,985/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6/8 ALE
-R189,610/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 150-250 2F (84.9% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 14 HC 1203 4P (R369,979/year)
Annual Cost Range: R221,015 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,210,148 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

14 MC 757 4P

87.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.1%
Power 17.4 kW
Head 16.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

14 HC 1203 4P

87.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 16.9 kW
Head 15.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

14 MC 756 4P

86.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 16.9 kW
Head 15.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

150-250 2F

82.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.9%
Power 22.6 kW
Head 22.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

125-250 2F

81.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 84.0%
Power 17.7 kW
Head 17.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

125-100-315 4P

79.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 24.3 kW
Head 21.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

200-150-315 4P

79.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.1%
Power 21.5 kW
Head 19.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

14 MC 755 4P

76.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.0%
Power 18.0 kW
Head 15.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

XF18

75.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.6%
Power 27.0 kW
Head 25.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

6/8 ALE

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.7%
Power 26.0 kW
Head 24.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection