Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
300.0 m³/hr Required
42.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 300.0 m³/hr
Head: 42.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
6X8X13H SJA
125-400 2F
150-400 2F
MISO 100-200
100-200 2F 2P
11 MQ H 1100VLT 2P
250-200-610 6P
200-150-460 4P
125-100-315 4P
6 K 6 VANE
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 83.8/100 83.1/100 75.6/100 75.2/100 74.7/100 74.1/100 73.1/100 72.1/100 71.5/100 71.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 50.0% 78.1% 80.7% 81.7% 81.9% 81.1% 70.6% 77.4% 70.0% 80.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 68.7 55.6 48.0 42.0 56.9 42.9 63.4 56.9 49.0 42.9
Head Accuracy 42.0m 53.1m 47.4m 42.0m 57.0m 42.6m 54.8m 53.9m 42.0m 42.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
6X8X13H SJA
R1,503,873/year
68.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-400 2F
R1,216,895/year
55.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-400 2F
R1,050,609/year
48.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MISO 100-200
R920,588/year
42.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 2F 2P
R1,245,256/year
56.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
11 MQ H 1100VLT 2P
R940,079/year
42.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-200-610 6P
R1,387,891/year
63.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-150-460 4P
R1,246,898/year
56.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-100-315 4P
R1,074,195/year
49.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 K 6 VANE
R939,926/year
42.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
6X8X13H SJA
R65,039
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-400 2F
R62,169
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-400 2F
R60,506
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MISO 100-200
R59,206
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 2F 2P
R62,453
Initial + 10-year energy cost
11 MQ H 1100VLT 2P
R59,401
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-200-610 6P
R63,879
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-150-460 4P
R62,469
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-100-315 4P
R60,742
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 K 6 VANE
R59,399
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
6X8X13H SJA
Baseline
Reference point
125-400 2F
+R286,978/year
Cost savings vs baseline
150-400 2F
+R453,264/year
Cost savings vs baseline
MISO 100-200
+R583,285/year
Cost savings vs baseline
100-200 2F 2P
+R258,617/year
Cost savings vs baseline
11 MQ H 1100VLT 2P
+R563,794/year
Cost savings vs baseline
250-200-610 6P
+R115,982/year
Cost savings vs baseline
200-150-460 4P
+R256,975/year
Cost savings vs baseline
125-100-315 4P
+R429,678/year
Cost savings vs baseline
6 K 6 VANE
+R563,947/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 100-200 2F 2P (81.9% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: MISO 100-200 (R920,588/year)
Annual Cost Range: R583,285 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R5,832,846 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

6X8X13H SJA

83.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 68.7 kW
Head 42.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

125-400 2F

83.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.1%
Power 55.6 kW
Head 53.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

150-400 2F

75.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.7%
Power 48.0 kW
Head 47.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

MISO 100-200

75.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.7%
Power 42.0 kW
Head 42.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

100-200 2F 2P

74.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.9%
Power 56.9 kW
Head 57.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

11 MQ H 1100VLT 2P

74.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.1%
Power 42.9 kW
Head 42.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

250-200-610 6P

73.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.6%
Power 63.4 kW
Head 54.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

200-150-460 4P

72.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.4%
Power 56.9 kW
Head 53.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

125-100-315 4P

71.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 49.0 kW
Head 42.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

6 K 6 VANE

71.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 42.9 kW
Head 42.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection