Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
292.0 m³/hr Required
44.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 292.0 m³/hr
Head: 44.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
125-400 2F
MISO 100-200
125-100-315 4P
100-200 2F 2P
150-400 2F
200-150-460 4P
250-200-610 6P
6/8 DME
6/8 DMP
125-315 2F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 85.6/100 81.1/100 79.8/100 77.4/100 77.1/100 76.2/100 73.8/100 72.7/100 72.7/100 72.1/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 78.3% 81.7% 70.0% 82.2% 80.2% 77.1% 70.1% 79.0% 79.0% 82.5%
Power Consumption (kW) 54.6 43.7 51.0 56.2 47.1 56.0 62.4 63.2 63.2 43.3
Head Accuracy 53.7m 44.9m 44.9m 58.1m 47.5m 54.3m 55.0m 62.7m 62.7m 44.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 78.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
125-400 2F
R1,195,674/year
54.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MISO 100-200
R957,906/year
43.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-100-315 4P
R1,117,732/year
51.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 2F 2P
R1,231,218/year
56.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-400 2F
R1,032,563/year
47.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-150-460 4P
R1,227,473/year
56.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
250-200-610 6P
R1,365,487/year
62.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6/8 DME
R1,384,102/year
63.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6/8 DMP
R1,384,102/year
63.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-315 2F
R948,971/year
43.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
125-400 2F
R61,957
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MISO 100-200
R59,579
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-100-315 4P
R61,177
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 2F 2P
R62,312
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-400 2F
R60,326
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-150-460 4P
R62,275
Initial + 10-year energy cost
250-200-610 6P
R63,655
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6/8 DME
R63,841
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6/8 DMP
R63,841
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-315 2F
R59,490
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
125-400 2F
Baseline
Reference point
MISO 100-200
+R237,768/year
Cost savings vs baseline
125-100-315 4P
+R77,942/year
Cost savings vs baseline
100-200 2F 2P
-R35,544/year
Additional cost vs baseline
150-400 2F
+R163,111/year
Cost savings vs baseline
200-150-460 4P
-R31,799/year
Additional cost vs baseline
250-200-610 6P
-R169,813/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6/8 DME
-R188,428/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6/8 DMP
-R188,428/year
Additional cost vs baseline
125-315 2F
+R246,704/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 125-315 2F (82.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 125-315 2F (R948,971/year)
Annual Cost Range: R435,131 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R4,351,311 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

125-400 2F

85.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.3%
Power 54.6 kW
Head 53.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

MISO 100-200

81.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.7%
Power 43.7 kW
Head 44.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

125-100-315 4P

79.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 51.0 kW
Head 44.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

100-200 2F 2P

77.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.2%
Power 56.2 kW
Head 58.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

150-400 2F

77.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.2%
Power 47.1 kW
Head 47.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

200-150-460 4P

76.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.1%
Power 56.0 kW
Head 54.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

250-200-610 6P

73.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.1%
Power 62.4 kW
Head 55.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

6/8 DME

72.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.0%
Power 63.2 kW
Head 62.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

6/8 DMP

72.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.0%
Power 63.2 kW
Head 62.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

125-315 2F

72.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.5%
Power 43.3 kW
Head 44.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection