Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
283.5 m³/hr Required
41.1 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 283.5 m³/hr
Head: 41.1 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
200-150-400 4P
6X8X13H SJA
125-400 2F
MISO 100-200
150-400 2F
200-150-460 4P
100-200 2F 2P
6 K 6 VANE
125-315 2F
200-200-430 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 89.0/100 83.0/100 82.8/100 78.6/100 75.5/100 75.2/100 74.6/100 72.5/100 72.2/100 71.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 79.1% 50.0% 78.4% 85.1% 80.3% 76.9% 82.5% 80.0% 80.5% 76.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 41.5 63.5 53.5 37.3 40.9 55.1 55.5 39.7 39.5 41.7
Head Accuracy 42.5m 41.1m 54.3m 41.1m 42.5m 54.8m 59.2m 41.1m 41.1m 41.1m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 79.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
200-150-400 4P
R908,346/year
41.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6X8X13H SJA
R1,390,716/year
63.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-400 2F
R1,172,395/year
53.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MISO 100-200
R817,286/year
37.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-400 2F
R896,498/year
40.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-150-460 4P
R1,206,121/year
55.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-200 2F 2P
R1,215,669/year
55.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 K 6 VANE
R869,189/year
39.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-315 2F
R864,327/year
39.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-430 4P
R914,084/year
41.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
200-150-400 4P
R59,083
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6X8X13H SJA
R63,907
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-400 2F
R61,724
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MISO 100-200
R58,173
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-400 2F
R58,965
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-150-460 4P
R62,061
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-200 2F 2P
R62,157
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 K 6 VANE
R58,692
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-315 2F
R58,643
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-430 4P
R59,141
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
200-150-400 4P
Baseline
Reference point
6X8X13H SJA
-R482,369/year
Additional cost vs baseline
125-400 2F
-R264,048/year
Additional cost vs baseline
MISO 100-200
+R91,060/year
Cost savings vs baseline
150-400 2F
+R11,848/year
Cost savings vs baseline
200-150-460 4P
-R297,774/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-200 2F 2P
-R307,323/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6 K 6 VANE
+R39,157/year
Cost savings vs baseline
125-315 2F
+R44,019/year
Cost savings vs baseline
200-200-430 4P
-R5,738/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: MISO 100-200 (85.1% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: MISO 100-200 (R817,286/year)
Annual Cost Range: R573,430 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R5,734,296 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

200-150-400 4P

89.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.1%
Power 41.5 kW
Head 42.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

6X8X13H SJA

83.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 63.5 kW
Head 41.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

125-400 2F

82.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.4%
Power 53.5 kW
Head 54.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

MISO 100-200

78.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.1%
Power 37.3 kW
Head 41.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

150-400 2F

75.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.3%
Power 40.9 kW
Head 42.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

200-150-460 4P

75.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.9%
Power 55.1 kW
Head 54.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

100-200 2F 2P

74.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.5%
Power 55.5 kW
Head 59.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

6 K 6 VANE

72.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 39.7 kW
Head 41.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

125-315 2F

72.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.5%
Power 39.5 kW
Head 41.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

200-200-430 4P

71.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.2%
Power 41.7 kW
Head 41.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection