Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

1 Pumps Analyzed
2808.0 m³/hr Required
265.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 2808.0 m³/hr
Head: 265.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
8X10X13 3S
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 33.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 86.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 11148.6
Head Accuracy 1264.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 86.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
8X10X13 3S
R244,154,975/year
11148.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
8X10X13 3S
R2,491,550
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
8X10X13 3S
Baseline
Reference point
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 8X10X13 3S (86.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 8X10X13 3S (R244,154,975/year)
Annual Cost Range: R0 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R0 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

8X10X13 3S

33.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 86.8%
Power 11148.6 kW
Head 1264.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection