Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
27.6 m³/hr Required
12.5 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 27.6 m³/hr
Head: 12.5 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
50-250 2F
6 LC
50-200 2F
80-50-315 4P
50-315 2F
4504-42565
100-80-250 4P
PJ 80 AS
2 KL
6 SLM 2P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 74.4/100 70.0/100 63.6/100 63.1/100 63.0/100 62.7/100 58.9/100 58.0/100 50.3/100 49.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 70.8% 75.8% 69.2% 55.1% 62.2% 60.5% 63.3% 72.3% 50.6% 66.1%
Power Consumption (kW) 1.7 1.5 1.8 3.3 3.0 3.8 1.7 3.3 2.9 1.7
Head Accuracy 16.1m 15.1m 16.6m 24.1m 24.9m 30.8m 14.4m 32.0m 19.5m 15.2m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 70.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.1%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
50-250 2F
R37,427/year
1.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 LC
R32,828/year
1.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-200 2F
R39,617/year
1.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 4P
R72,160/year
3.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-315 2F
R65,897/year
3.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4504-42565
R83,789/year
3.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-80-250 4P
R37,493/year
1.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 80 AS
R72,927/year
3.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
2 KL
R63,510/year
2.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 SLM 2P
R37,756/year
1.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
50-250 2F
R50,374
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 LC
R50,328
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-200 2F
R50,396
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 4P
R50,722
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-315 2F
R50,659
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4504-42565
R50,838
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-80-250 4P
R50,375
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 80 AS
R50,729
Initial + 10-year energy cost
2 KL
R50,635
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 SLM 2P
R50,378
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
50-250 2F
Baseline
Reference point
6 LC
+R4,599/year
Cost savings vs baseline
50-200 2F
-R2,190/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 4P
-R34,733/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-315 2F
-R28,470/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4504-42565
-R46,362/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-80-250 4P
-R66/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PJ 80 AS
-R35,500/year
Additional cost vs baseline
2 KL
-R26,083/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6 SLM 2P
-R328/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 6 LC (75.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 6 LC (R32,828/year)
Annual Cost Range: R50,961 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R509,613 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

50-250 2F

74.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.8%
Power 1.7 kW
Head 16.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

6 LC

70.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.8%
Power 1.5 kW
Head 15.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

50-200 2F

63.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.2%
Power 1.8 kW
Head 16.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

80-50-315 4P

63.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.1%
Power 3.3 kW
Head 24.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

50-315 2F

63.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.2%
Power 3.0 kW
Head 24.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

4504-42565

62.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.5%
Power 3.8 kW
Head 30.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

100-80-250 4P

58.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.3%
Power 1.7 kW
Head 14.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

PJ 80 AS

58.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.3%
Power 3.3 kW
Head 32.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

2 KL

50.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.6%
Power 2.9 kW
Head 19.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

6 SLM 2P

49.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.1%
Power 1.7 kW
Head 15.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection