Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

7 Pumps Analyzed
240.8 m³/hr Required
310.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 240.8 m³/hr
Head: 310.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
PJ 200
8X10X13 3S NEW
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
8X10X13 4S NEW
8X10X13 4S2P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 61.8/100 38.1/100 20.4/100 20.1/100 20.1/100 14.1/100 -5.7/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 60.0% 79.0% 66.0% 67.0% 67.0% 63.4% 63.5%
Power Consumption (kW) 340.0 258.2 455.9 304.5 304.5 640.3 1275.7
Head Accuracy 310.9m 310.9m 458.3m 310.9m 310.9m 618.5m 1234.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
R7,446,241/year
340.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 200
R5,655,368/year
258.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 3S NEW
R9,983,706/year
455.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
R6,668,265/year
304.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
R6,668,265/year
304.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 4S NEW
R14,022,001/year
640.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 4S2P
R27,938,794/year
1275.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
R124,462
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 200
R106,554
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 3S NEW
R149,837
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
R116,683
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
R116,683
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 4S NEW
R190,220
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 4S2P
R329,388
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
Baseline
Reference point
PJ 200
+R1,790,873/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8X10X13 3S NEW
-R2,537,465/year
Additional cost vs baseline
MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)
+R777,976/year
Cost savings vs baseline
MSD10x10x13.5 3 4
+R777,976/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8X10X13 4S NEW
-R6,575,760/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8X10X13 4S2P
-R20,492,553/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: PJ 200 (79.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: PJ 200 (R5,655,368/year)
Annual Cost Range: R22,283,425 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R222,834,252 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

4X6X13.25 L GSJH

61.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 340.0 kW
Head 310.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

PJ 200

38.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.0%
Power 258.2 kW
Head 310.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

8X10X13 3S NEW

20.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.0%
Power 455.9 kW
Head 458.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

MSD 10x10x13.5 3(4)

20.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.0%
Power 304.5 kW
Head 310.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

MSD10x10x13.5 3 4

20.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.0%
Power 304.5 kW
Head 310.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

8X10X13 4S NEW

14.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.4%
Power 640.3 kW
Head 618.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

8X10X13 4S2P

-5.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.5%
Power 1275.7 kW
Head 1234.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection