Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
237.8 m³/hr Required
9.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 237.8 m³/hr
Head: 9.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
200-200-250A 4P
14 MC 755 4P
12 HC 1133 4P
150-150-200 4P
125-250 2F
150-125-250 4P
200-200-430 6P
16 HC 1262 6P
14 MC 756 4P
12 HC 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 79.1/100 78.3/100 77.8/100 77.3/100 75.2/100 74.2/100 72.1/100 71.4/100 71.1/100 70.2/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 75.2% 80.7% 79.3% 78.2% 86.0% 78.8% 79.7% 76.0% 78.5% 77.0%
Power Consumption (kW) 9.8 11.3 8.6 9.6 14.2 14.3 13.3 9.1 13.4 8.5
Head Accuracy 11.4m 14.1m 10.5m 11.6m 18.9m 17.3m 16.4m 10.7m 16.3m 10.1m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 86.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 79.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 76.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.0%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
200-200-250A 4P
R215,233/year
9.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 755 4P
R247,426/year
11.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 HC 1133 4P
R187,683/year
8.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-150-200 4P
R209,780/year
9.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
125-250 2F
R311,944/year
14.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
150-125-250 4P
R312,163/year
14.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
200-200-430 6P
R292,124/year
13.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
16 HC 1262 6P
R200,188/year
9.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 MC 756 4P
R294,117/year
13.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 HC 4P
R185,821/year
8.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
200-200-250A 4P
R52,152
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 755 4P
R52,474
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 HC 1133 4P
R51,877
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-150-200 4P
R52,098
Initial + 10-year energy cost
125-250 2F
R53,119
Initial + 10-year energy cost
150-125-250 4P
R53,122
Initial + 10-year energy cost
200-200-430 6P
R52,921
Initial + 10-year energy cost
16 HC 1262 6P
R52,002
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 MC 756 4P
R52,941
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 HC 4P
R51,858
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
200-200-250A 4P
Baseline
Reference point
14 MC 755 4P
-R32,193/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12 HC 1133 4P
+R27,550/year
Cost savings vs baseline
150-150-200 4P
+R5,453/year
Cost savings vs baseline
125-250 2F
-R96,710/year
Additional cost vs baseline
150-125-250 4P
-R96,929/year
Additional cost vs baseline
200-200-430 6P
-R76,891/year
Additional cost vs baseline
16 HC 1262 6P
+R15,045/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14 MC 756 4P
-R78,884/year
Additional cost vs baseline
12 HC 4P
+R29,412/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 125-250 2F (86.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 12 HC 4P (R185,821/year)
Annual Cost Range: R126,341 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,263,411 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

200-200-250A 4P

79.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 9.8 kW
Head 11.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

14 MC 755 4P

78.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.7%
Power 11.3 kW
Head 14.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

12 HC 1133 4P

77.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.3%
Power 8.6 kW
Head 10.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

150-150-200 4P

77.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.2%
Power 9.6 kW
Head 11.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

125-250 2F

75.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 86.0%
Power 14.2 kW
Head 18.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

150-125-250 4P

74.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.8%
Power 14.3 kW
Head 17.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

200-200-430 6P

72.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 79.7%
Power 13.3 kW
Head 16.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

16 HC 1262 6P

71.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 76.0%
Power 9.1 kW
Head 10.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

14 MC 756 4P

71.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.5%
Power 13.4 kW
Head 16.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

12 HC 4P

70.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.0%
Power 8.5 kW
Head 10.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection