Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
21.2 m³/hr Required
25.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 21.2 m³/hr
Head: 25.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
PJ 80 AS
WXH-50-160 2P
32-200 2F 2P
80-50-315 4P
4504-42565
WXH-64-32-50
50-315 2F
1.5X2X8.5 H
WXH-64-40-65
100-80-250 4P
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 71.2/100 71.1/100 70.0/100 67.6/100 62.9/100 62.8/100 50.7/100 46.2/100 41.6/100 39.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 71.1% 55.5% 63.9% 45.5% 50.1% 55.6% 49.9% 52.9% 56.1% 49.4%
Power Consumption (kW) 2.9 2.7 3.8 4.8 3.8 3.3 4.4 6.3 4.4 3.5
Head Accuracy 35.5m 26.0m 42.4m 37.9m 32.6m 31.9m 38.0m 58.1m 42.6m 30.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 71.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 45.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 49.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 52.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 56.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 49.4%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
PJ 80 AS
R63,072/year
2.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-50-160 2P
R59,349/year
2.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F 2P
R84,052/year
3.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 4P
R105,514/year
4.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4504-42565
R82,432/year
3.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-32-50
R72,620/year
3.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-315 2F
R96,470/year
4.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
1.5X2X8.5 H
R138,999/year
6.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-40-65
R96,097/year
4.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
100-80-250 4P
R76,760/year
3.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
PJ 80 AS
R50,631
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-50-160 2P
R50,593
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F 2P
R50,841
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 4P
R51,055
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4504-42565
R50,824
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-32-50
R50,726
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-315 2F
R50,965
Initial + 10-year energy cost
1.5X2X8.5 H
R51,390
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-40-65
R50,961
Initial + 10-year energy cost
100-80-250 4P
R50,768
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
PJ 80 AS
Baseline
Reference point
WXH-50-160 2P
+R3,723/year
Cost savings vs baseline
32-200 2F 2P
-R20,980/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 4P
-R42,442/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4504-42565
-R19,360/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-32-50
-R9,548/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-315 2F
-R33,398/year
Additional cost vs baseline
1.5X2X8.5 H
-R75,927/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-40-65
-R33,025/year
Additional cost vs baseline
100-80-250 4P
-R13,688/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: PJ 80 AS (71.1% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: WXH-50-160 2P (R59,349/year)
Annual Cost Range: R79,650 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R796,503 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

PJ 80 AS

71.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.1%
Power 2.9 kW
Head 35.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

WXH-50-160 2P

71.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.5%
Power 2.7 kW
Head 26.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

32-200 2F 2P

70.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.9%
Power 3.8 kW
Head 42.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

80-50-315 4P

67.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 45.5%
Power 4.8 kW
Head 37.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

4504-42565

62.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.1%
Power 3.8 kW
Head 32.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

WXH-64-32-50

62.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.6%
Power 3.3 kW
Head 31.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

50-315 2F

50.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.9%
Power 4.4 kW
Head 38.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

1.5X2X8.5 H

46.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 52.9%
Power 6.3 kW
Head 58.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

WXH-64-40-65

41.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 56.1%
Power 4.4 kW
Head 42.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

100-80-250 4P

39.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.4%
Power 3.5 kW
Head 30.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection