Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

1 Pumps Analyzed
19021.0 m³/hr Required
44.9 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 19021.0 m³/hr
Head: 44.9 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
48/48 LONOVANE
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 56.4/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 91.5%
Power Consumption (kW) 2543.5
Head Accuracy 44.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 91.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
48/48 LONOVANE
R55,701,796/year
2543.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
48/48 LONOVANE
R607,018
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
48/48 LONOVANE
Baseline
Reference point
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 48/48 LONOVANE (91.5% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 48/48 LONOVANE (R55,701,796/year)
Annual Cost Range: R0 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R0 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

48/48 LONOVANE

56.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 91.5%
Power 2543.5 kW
Head 44.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection