Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
19.5 m³/hr Required
15.1 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 19.5 m³/hr
Head: 15.1 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
80-50-315 4P
PJ 80 AS
6 LC
32-200 2F 2P
50-250 2F
WXH-50-160 2P
WXH-64-32-50
50-200 2F
4506-48170
4504-42565
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 62.7/100 62.0/100 59.6/100 54.6/100 54.5/100 53.6/100 49.6/100 44.5/100 43.4/100 43.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 50.9% 69.2% 66.9% 63.2% 62.7% 55.8% 55.9% 60.4% 44.5% 46.5%
Power Consumption (kW) 2.7 1.9 1.3 3.6 1.4 2.6 3.2 1.5 1.9 3.8
Head Accuracy 26.3m 24.7m 16.6m 43.3m 16.7m 27.2m 33.3m 16.9m 15.6m 32.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 50.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 44.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 46.5%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
80-50-315 4P
R60,006/year
2.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 80 AS
R41,457/year
1.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 LC
R28,864/year
1.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F 2P
R79,804/year
3.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F
R31,054/year
1.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-50-160 2P
R56,699/year
2.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-32-50
R69,357/year
3.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-200 2F
R32,675/year
1.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4506-48170
R40,844/year
1.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4504-42565
R82,213/year
3.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
80-50-315 4P
R50,600
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 80 AS
R50,415
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 LC
R50,289
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F 2P
R50,798
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F
R50,311
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-50-160 2P
R50,567
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-32-50
R50,694
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-200 2F
R50,327
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4506-48170
R50,408
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4504-42565
R50,822
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
80-50-315 4P
Baseline
Reference point
PJ 80 AS
+R18,549/year
Cost savings vs baseline
6 LC
+R31,142/year
Cost savings vs baseline
32-200 2F 2P
-R19,798/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F
+R28,952/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-50-160 2P
+R3,307/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-64-32-50
-R9,351/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-200 2F
+R27,331/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4506-48170
+R19,162/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4504-42565
-R22,207/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: PJ 80 AS (69.2% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 6 LC (R28,864/year)
Annual Cost Range: R53,348 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R533,484 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

80-50-315 4P

62.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.9%
Power 2.7 kW
Head 26.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

PJ 80 AS

62.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.2%
Power 1.9 kW
Head 24.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

6 LC

59.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.9%
Power 1.3 kW
Head 16.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

32-200 2F 2P

54.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.2%
Power 3.6 kW
Head 43.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

50-250 2F

54.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.7%
Power 1.4 kW
Head 16.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

WXH-50-160 2P

53.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.8%
Power 2.6 kW
Head 27.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

WXH-64-32-50

49.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.9%
Power 3.2 kW
Head 33.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

50-200 2F

44.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.4%
Power 1.5 kW
Head 16.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

4506-48170

43.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 44.5%
Power 1.9 kW
Head 15.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

4504-42565

43.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 46.5%
Power 3.8 kW
Head 32.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection