Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
19.2 m³/hr Required
7.7 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 19.2 m³/hr
Head: 7.7 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
6 XLC
4505-48159
WXH-65-185
80-50-315 4P
PJ 80 AS
65-160 2F
6 LC
50-160 2F
50-250 2F
32-200 2F
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 69.5/100 66.4/100 66.1/100 62.0/100 45.2/100 41.6/100 39.2/100 38.8/100 37.4/100 36.1/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 71.8% 65.2% 56.1% 55.0% 69.0% 53.9% 66.3% 59.4% 63.1% 55.9%
Power Consumption (kW) 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.9 0.8 1.3 0.9 1.2 1.0
Head Accuracy 9.0m 11.3m 8.0m 14.3m 24.8m 7.9m 16.6m 9.7m 14.6m 10.8m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 71.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 56.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 53.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 59.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 63.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 55.9%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
6 XLC
R14,366/year
0.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4505-48159
R19,951/year
0.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-65-185
R16,337/year
0.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-50-315 4P
R29,762/year
1.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 80 AS
R41,172/year
1.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-160 2F
R16,819/year
0.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
6 LC
R28,711/year
1.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-160 2F
R18,724/year
0.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
50-250 2F
R26,521/year
1.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32-200 2F
R22,075/year
1.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
6 XLC
R50,144
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4505-48159
R50,200
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-65-185
R50,163
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-50-315 4P
R50,298
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 80 AS
R50,412
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-160 2F
R50,168
Initial + 10-year energy cost
6 LC
R50,287
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-160 2F
R50,187
Initial + 10-year energy cost
50-250 2F
R50,265
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32-200 2F
R50,221
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
6 XLC
Baseline
Reference point
4505-48159
-R5,584/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-65-185
-R1,971/year
Additional cost vs baseline
80-50-315 4P
-R15,396/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PJ 80 AS
-R26,806/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-160 2F
-R2,453/year
Additional cost vs baseline
6 LC
-R14,344/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-160 2F
-R4,358/year
Additional cost vs baseline
50-250 2F
-R12,154/year
Additional cost vs baseline
32-200 2F
-R7,709/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 6 XLC (71.8% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 6 XLC (R14,366/year)
Annual Cost Range: R26,806 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R268,056 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

6 XLC

69.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.8%
Power 0.7 kW
Head 9.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

4505-48159

66.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.2%
Power 0.9 kW
Head 11.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

WXH-65-185

66.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 56.1%
Power 0.7 kW
Head 8.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

80-50-315 4P

62.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.0%
Power 1.4 kW
Head 14.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

PJ 80 AS

45.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.0%
Power 1.9 kW
Head 24.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

65-160 2F

41.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 53.9%
Power 0.8 kW
Head 7.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

6 LC

39.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.3%
Power 1.3 kW
Head 16.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

50-160 2F

38.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 59.4%
Power 0.9 kW
Head 9.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

50-250 2F

37.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 63.1%
Power 1.2 kW
Head 14.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

32-200 2F

36.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 55.9%
Power 1.0 kW
Head 10.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection