Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

2 Pumps Analyzed
1873.0 m³/hr Required
358.8 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 1873.0 m³/hr
Head: 358.8 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
PJ 200
8X10X13 3S
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 63.4/100 21.6/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 49.0% 81.9%
Power Consumption (kW) 3737.3 8957.9
Head Accuracy 358.8m 1437.2m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 49.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 81.9%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
PJ 200
R81,847,374/year
3737.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8X10X13 3S
R196,178,974/year
8957.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
PJ 200
R868,474
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8X10X13 3S
R2,011,790
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
PJ 200
Baseline
Reference point
8X10X13 3S
-R114,331,600/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 8X10X13 3S (81.9% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: PJ 200 (R81,847,374/year)
Annual Cost Range: R114,331,600 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R1,143,315,999 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

PJ 200

63.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 49.0%
Power 3737.3 kW
Head 358.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

8X10X13 3S

21.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 81.9%
Power 8957.9 kW
Head 1437.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection