Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
187.5 m³/hr Required
120.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 187.5 m³/hr
Head: 120.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
PL 100 AS
4x6x13.25 H-SJA
PL 100 AN
PJ 250 AN
PL 150 AN
WXH-64-125-150A
PL 150 AS
80-250 2F 2P
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
SCP 150/580HA-132/4
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 76.1/100 72.4/100 70.1/100 69.4/100 69.2/100 68.1/100 67.2/100 65.0/100 54.3/100 53.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 60.0% 70.9% 60.0% 50.0% 75.2% 71.5% 72.0% 78.0% 69.8% 65.7%
Power Consumption (kW) 102.2 105.4 102.2 122.6 97.3 103.8 101.7 78.6 183.0 97.2
Head Accuracy 120.0m 146.2m 120.0m 120.0m 143.2m 145.2m 143.4m 120.0m 250.0m 125.0m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 72.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 78.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 65.7%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
PL 100 AS
R2,237,917/year
102.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4x6x13.25 H-SJA
R2,307,559/year
105.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 100 AN
R2,237,917/year
102.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PJ 250 AN
R2,685,488/year
122.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 150 AN
R2,130,016/year
97.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-125-150A
R2,273,439/year
103.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 150 AS
R2,226,770/year
101.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
80-250 2F 2P
R1,721,471/year
78.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
R4,007,766/year
183.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
SCP 150/580HA-132/4
R2,128,987/year
97.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
PL 100 AS
R72,379
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4x6x13.25 H-SJA
R73,076
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 100 AN
R72,379
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PJ 250 AN
R76,855
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 150 AN
R71,300
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-125-150A
R72,734
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 150 AS
R72,268
Initial + 10-year energy cost
80-250 2F 2P
R67,215
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
R90,078
Initial + 10-year energy cost
SCP 150/580HA-132/4
R71,290
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
PL 100 AS
Baseline
Reference point
4x6x13.25 H-SJA
-R69,642/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 100 AN
-R-0/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PJ 250 AN
-R447,570/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 150 AN
+R107,901/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-64-125-150A
-R35,522/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 150 AS
+R11,147/year
Cost savings vs baseline
80-250 2F 2P
+R516,446/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4X6X13.25 L GSJH
-R1,769,848/year
Additional cost vs baseline
SCP 150/580HA-132/4
+R108,931/year
Cost savings vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 80-250 2F 2P (78.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 80-250 2F 2P (R1,721,471/year)
Annual Cost Range: R2,286,294 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R22,862,943 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

PL 100 AS

76.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 102.2 kW
Head 120.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

4x6x13.25 H-SJA

72.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.9%
Power 105.4 kW
Head 146.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

PL 100 AN

70.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 102.2 kW
Head 120.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

PJ 250 AN

69.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 122.6 kW
Head 120.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

PL 150 AN

69.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.2%
Power 97.3 kW
Head 143.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

WXH-64-125-150A

68.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.5%
Power 103.8 kW
Head 145.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

PL 150 AS

67.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.0%
Power 101.7 kW
Head 143.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

80-250 2F 2P

65.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 78.0%
Power 78.6 kW
Head 120.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

4X6X13.25 L GSJH

54.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.8%
Power 183.0 kW
Head 250.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

SCP 150/580HA-132/4

53.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 65.7%
Power 97.2 kW
Head 125.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection