Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
1800.0 m³/hr Required
7.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 1800.0 m³/hr
Head: 7.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
8312-20 342T
8312-20 341T
14 WLN 19A
8312-16 371T
8312-16 370F
32 HC 8P
8312-30 A333T
14/16 BLE
28 HC 8P
8312-24 363T
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 74.6/100 73.7/100 67.7/100 66.3/100 65.8/100 59.6/100 56.8/100 53.0/100 52.3/100 51.5/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 82.8% 85.0% 82.3% 85.0% 83.0% 85.1% 85.0% 80.6% 80.0% 77.2%
Power Consumption (kW) 41.5 42.7 79.3 40.4 41.4 113.5 40.4 148.3 42.9 59.0
Head Accuracy 7.0m 7.4m 13.3m 7.0m 7.0m 19.7m 7.0m 24.4m 7.0m 9.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 82.8%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 82.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 83.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 85.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 80.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 77.2%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
8312-20 342T
R907,777/year
41.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-20 341T
R934,823/year
42.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14 WLN 19A
R1,735,597/year
79.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-16 371T
R884,629/year
40.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-16 370F
R905,937/year
41.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
32 HC 8P
R2,485,957/year
113.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-30 A333T
R884,629/year
40.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
14/16 BLE
R3,247,704/year
148.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
28 HC 8P
R939,926/year
42.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
8312-24 363T
R1,292,801/year
59.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
8312-20 342T
R59,078
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-20 341T
R59,348
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14 WLN 19A
R67,356
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-16 371T
R58,846
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-16 370F
R59,059
Initial + 10-year energy cost
32 HC 8P
R74,860
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-30 A333T
R58,846
Initial + 10-year energy cost
14/16 BLE
R82,477
Initial + 10-year energy cost
28 HC 8P
R59,399
Initial + 10-year energy cost
8312-24 363T
R62,928
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
8312-20 342T
Baseline
Reference point
8312-20 341T
-R27,046/year
Additional cost vs baseline
14 WLN 19A
-R827,820/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8312-16 371T
+R23,148/year
Cost savings vs baseline
8312-16 370F
+R1,840/year
Cost savings vs baseline
32 HC 8P
-R1,578,180/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8312-30 A333T
+R23,148/year
Cost savings vs baseline
14/16 BLE
-R2,339,927/year
Additional cost vs baseline
28 HC 8P
-R32,149/year
Additional cost vs baseline
8312-24 363T
-R385,024/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 32 HC 8P (85.1% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 8312-16 371T (R884,629/year)
Annual Cost Range: R2,363,076 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R23,630,757 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

8312-20 342T

74.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.8%
Power 41.5 kW
Head 7.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

8312-20 341T

73.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.0%
Power 42.7 kW
Head 7.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

14 WLN 19A

67.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 82.3%
Power 79.3 kW
Head 13.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

8312-16 371T

66.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.0%
Power 40.4 kW
Head 7.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

8312-16 370F

65.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 83.0%
Power 41.4 kW
Head 7.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

32 HC 8P

59.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.1%
Power 113.5 kW
Head 19.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

8312-30 A333T

56.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 85.0%
Power 40.4 kW
Head 7.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

14/16 BLE

53.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.6%
Power 148.3 kW
Head 24.4 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

28 HC 8P

52.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 80.0%
Power 42.9 kW
Head 7.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

8312-24 363T

51.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 77.2%
Power 59.0 kW
Head 9.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection