Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
116.0 m³/hr Required
66.0 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 116.0 m³/hr
Head: 66.0 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
4/5 CME
4/5 DME
WXH-64-80-125
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
65-250 2F 2P
PL 80 AS
3X4X10.5 H SJA
PL 100 AN
65-200 2F 2P
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 85.2/100 81.9/100 78.9/100 76.7/100 75.9/100 75.3/100 73.5/100 72.6/100 69.8/100 66.6/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 60.0% 73.5% 64.3% 70.7% 71.9% 60.0% 67.4% 69.0% 75.0% 68.6%
Power Consumption (kW) 34.8 37.0 34.5 31.7 35.5 34.8 31.7 34.2 27.8 37.5
Head Accuracy 66.0m 86.1m 70.2m 70.9m 80.9m 66.0m 67.6m 74.8m 66.0m 81.3m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 64.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 60.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 75.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.6%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
4/5 CME
R761,485/year
34.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 DME
R810,169/year
37.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-80-125
R755,134/year
34.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R694,252/year
31.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F 2P
R778,195/year
35.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 80 AS
R761,485/year
34.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R694,230/year
31.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 100 AN
R749,987/year
34.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R609,192/year
27.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
R820,440/year
37.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
4/5 CME
R57,615
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 DME
R58,102
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-80-125
R57,551
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R56,943
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F 2P
R57,782
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 80 AS
R57,615
Initial + 10-year energy cost
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R56,942
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 100 AN
R57,500
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R56,092
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
R58,204
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
4/5 CME
Baseline
Reference point
4/5 DME
-R48,684/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-80-125
+R6,351/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
+R67,233/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-250 2F 2P
-R16,710/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 80 AS
-R-0/year
Additional cost vs baseline
3X4X10.5 H SJA
+R67,255/year
Cost savings vs baseline
PL 100 AN
+R11,498/year
Cost savings vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
+R152,293/year
Cost savings vs baseline
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
-R58,955/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 2F 2P (75.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F 2P (R609,192/year)
Annual Cost Range: R211,247 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,112,474 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

4/5 CME

85.2
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 34.8 kW
Head 66.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

4/5 DME

81.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.5%
Power 37.0 kW
Head 86.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

WXH-64-80-125

78.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 64.3%
Power 34.5 kW
Head 70.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

4/5 2 STAGE MEDI

76.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.7%
Power 31.7 kW
Head 70.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

65-250 2F 2P

75.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.9%
Power 35.5 kW
Head 80.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

PL 80 AS

75.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 60.0%
Power 34.8 kW
Head 66.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

3X4X10.5 H SJA

73.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.4%
Power 31.7 kW
Head 67.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

PL 100 AN

72.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.0%
Power 34.2 kW
Head 74.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

65-200 2F 2P

69.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 75.0%
Power 27.8 kW
Head 66.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

12 LC 9stg (Test Results)

66.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.6%
Power 37.5 kW
Head 81.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection