Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
109.7 m³/hr Required
71.7 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 109.7 m³/hr
Head: 71.7 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
4/5 DME
65-250 2F 2P
PL 80 AS
3X4X10.5 H SJA
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
WXH-64-80-125
PL 100 AN
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
65-200 2F 2P
WXH-64-100-150
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 83.7/100 81.6/100 76.8/100 75.4/100 74.0/100 73.5/100 72.0/100 68.5/100 68.5/100 65.3/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 72.7% 71.1% 50.0% 70.1% 69.5% 64.6% 68.3% 69.5% 73.0% 62.8%
Power Consumption (kW) 35.9 31.0 42.9 30.6 31.1 33.2 34.0 36.9 29.4 40.2
Head Accuracy 87.3m 73.7m 71.7m 71.7m 72.3m 71.7m 77.7m 85.8m 71.7m 84.5m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 72.7%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 64.6%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 68.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 69.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 73.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.8%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
4/5 DME
R785,838/year
35.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F 2P
R678,790/year
31.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 80 AS
R938,787/year
42.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R669,790/year
30.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R681,418/year
31.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-80-125
R727,058/year
33.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 100 AN
R743,965/year
34.0 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
R808,789/year
36.9 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-200 2F 2P
R643,006/year
29.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-100-150
R880,139/year
40.2 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
4/5 DME
R57,858
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F 2P
R56,788
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 80 AS
R59,388
Initial + 10-year energy cost
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R56,698
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
R56,814
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-80-125
R57,271
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 100 AN
R57,440
Initial + 10-year energy cost
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
R58,088
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-200 2F 2P
R56,430
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-100-150
R58,801
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
4/5 DME
Baseline
Reference point
65-250 2F 2P
+R107,047/year
Cost savings vs baseline
PL 80 AS
-R152,950/year
Additional cost vs baseline
3X4X10.5 H SJA
+R116,048/year
Cost savings vs baseline
4/5 2 STAGE MEDI
+R104,419/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-64-80-125
+R58,780/year
Cost savings vs baseline
PL 100 AN
+R41,873/year
Cost savings vs baseline
12 LC 9stg (Test Results)
-R22,951/year
Additional cost vs baseline
65-200 2F 2P
+R142,832/year
Cost savings vs baseline
WXH-64-100-150
-R94,301/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: 65-200 2F 2P (73.0% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-200 2F 2P (R643,006/year)
Annual Cost Range: R295,781 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R2,957,814 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

4/5 DME

83.7
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.7%
Power 35.9 kW
Head 87.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

65-250 2F 2P

81.6
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.1%
Power 31.0 kW
Head 73.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

PL 80 AS

76.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.0%
Power 42.9 kW
Head 71.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

3X4X10.5 H SJA

75.4
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.1%
Power 30.6 kW
Head 71.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

4/5 2 STAGE MEDI

74.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.5%
Power 31.1 kW
Head 72.3 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

WXH-64-80-125

73.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 64.6%
Power 33.2 kW
Head 71.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

PL 100 AN

72.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 68.3%
Power 34.0 kW
Head 77.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

12 LC 9stg (Test Results)

68.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 69.5%
Power 36.9 kW
Head 85.8 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

65-200 2F 2P

68.5
Overall Score
Efficiency 73.0%
Power 29.4 kW
Head 71.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

WXH-64-100-150

65.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.8%
Power 40.2 kW
Head 84.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection