Pump Performance Comparison

Intelligent side-by-side analysis powered by APE engineering expertise

10 Pumps Analyzed
108.9 m³/hr Required
92.6 m Head Required
Application Requirements
Flow Rate: 108.9 m³/hr
Head: 92.6 m
Application: Water Supply
Liquid: Clean Water

📊 Detailed Performance Comparison

Compare key specifications and performance metrics across all pump options

sort Sort by:
Parameter
4/5 DME
65-250 2F 2P
3X4X10.5 H SJA
MISO 65-315H
WXH-64-100-150
PL 100 AN
Nitz 100-80-250
4/40 GME
PL 100 AS
WXH-64-100-150B
Add to Shortlist
Overall Score 91.1/100 81.0/100 77.9/100 70.9/100 65.0/100 64.3/100 63.8/100 57.8/100 54.1/100 47.0/100
Pump Type
Efficiency (%) 72.4% 70.3% 50.1% 67.2% 62.5% 66.3% 71.2% 70.0% 67.9% 74.7%
Power Consumption (kW) 40.1 39.1 54.8 54.4 52.3 51.5 48.1 71.3 47.6 45.7
Head Accuracy 97.9m 92.7m 92.6m 123.1m 110.2m 115.0m 115.5m 168.1m 108.9m 114.9m
Impeller Size (mm)
Operating Point Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range Within Range
Selection Reason Efficiency: 72.4%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 50.1%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 62.5%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 66.3%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 71.2%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 70.0%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 67.9%, Head error: 0.0% Efficiency: 74.7%, Head error: 0.0%
Actions

* Indicates extrapolated values beyond tested curve range

💰 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

Compare operating costs and long-term financial impact over 10-year lifespan

Annual Energy Cost
4/5 DME
R878,694/year
40.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
65-250 2F 2P
R856,969/year
39.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R1,200,230/year
54.8 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
MISO 65-315H
R1,190,615/year
54.4 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-100-150
R1,146,268/year
52.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 100 AN
R1,127,565/year
51.5 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
Nitz 100-80-250
R1,053,718/year
48.1 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
4/40 GME
R1,561,251/year
71.3 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
PL 100 AS
R1,041,586/year
47.6 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
WXH-64-100-150B
R999,866/year
45.7 kW × 8760h × R2.49/kWh
10-Year Total Cost
4/5 DME
R58,787
Initial + 10-year energy cost
65-250 2F 2P
R58,570
Initial + 10-year energy cost
3X4X10.5 H SJA
R62,002
Initial + 10-year energy cost
MISO 65-315H
R61,906
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-100-150
R61,463
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 100 AN
R61,276
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Nitz 100-80-250
R60,537
Initial + 10-year energy cost
4/40 GME
R65,613
Initial + 10-year energy cost
PL 100 AS
R60,416
Initial + 10-year energy cost
WXH-64-100-150B
R59,999
Initial + 10-year energy cost
Annual Cost Comparison
4/5 DME
Baseline
Reference point
65-250 2F 2P
+R21,725/year
Cost savings vs baseline
3X4X10.5 H SJA
-R321,536/year
Additional cost vs baseline
MISO 65-315H
-R311,922/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-100-150
-R267,574/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 100 AN
-R248,872/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Nitz 100-80-250
-R175,025/year
Additional cost vs baseline
4/40 GME
-R682,557/year
Additional cost vs baseline
PL 100 AS
-R162,892/year
Additional cost vs baseline
WXH-64-100-150B
-R121,173/year
Additional cost vs baseline
Cost Analysis Summary
Most Efficient: WXH-64-100-150B (74.7% efficiency)
Lowest Operating Cost: 65-250 2F 2P (R856,969/year)
Annual Cost Range: R704,282 difference between highest and lowest
10-Year Impact: R7,042,821 total savings potential

🔧 Individual Pump Overview

Detailed cards view with performance metrics and direct actions for each pump option

BEST MATCH

4/5 DME

91.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 72.4%
Power 40.1 kW
Head 97.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 2

65-250 2F 2P

81.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.3%
Power 39.1 kW
Head 92.7 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 3

3X4X10.5 H SJA

77.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 50.1%
Power 54.8 kW
Head 92.6 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 4

MISO 65-315H

70.9
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.2%
Power 54.4 kW
Head 123.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 5

WXH-64-100-150

65.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 62.5%
Power 52.3 kW
Head 110.2 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 6

PL 100 AN

64.3
Overall Score
Efficiency 66.3%
Power 51.5 kW
Head 115.0 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 7

Nitz 100-80-250

63.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 71.2%
Power 48.1 kW
Head 115.5 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 8

4/40 GME

57.8
Overall Score
Efficiency 70.0%
Power 71.3 kW
Head 168.1 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 9

PL 100 AS

54.1
Overall Score
Efficiency 67.9%
Power 47.6 kW
Head 108.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
RANK 10

WXH-64-100-150B

47.0
Overall Score
Efficiency 74.7%
Power 45.7 kW
Head 114.9 m
Impeller mm
Manufacturer APE Pumps
description Full Report
picture_as_pdfDownload Comparison Report arrow_backNew Selection